Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

For the discussion of Toho produced and distributed films or shows released before 1980.
edgaguirus
Sazer
Posts: 10049
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by edgaguirus »

So, the authorities felt the details on the model buildings were too realistic?
Is that so? Where are you going?
Uruguay
Well, you go Uruguay and I'll go mine.

They're here already! You're next! You're next!

User avatar
Great Hierophant
Interpol Agent
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by Great Hierophant »

The attack sequence in Godzilla: King of the Monsters is nearly the same until after Godzilla torches the police vehicle and the watch tower. In this sequence of events, he nearly floods the Sukiya Bridge and caves in the Toho Nichigeki Theater with his tail. Then he is next seen in front of the Diet building. Next comes the crushing of the Wako Clock Tower, then he approaches the TV tower and chews down on it (with the Diet building in the background). The next shots show him roaring at the birdcage and his destruction of the "news office" (where Steve Martin was incapacitated). These shots were originally of Godzilla stomping through the wing of the Diet building and incinerating the Matsuzakaya Department Store. In reality the two landmarks are separated by about 4 miles. Essentially in this version Godzilla teleports miles away from shot to shot.

User avatar
msmahi
Ronin
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2024 7:49 am

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by msmahi »

Great Hierophant wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2024 11:51 am The attack sequence in Godzilla: King of the Monsters is nearly the same until after Godzilla torches the police vehicle and the watch tower. In this sequence of events, he nearly floods the Sukiya Bridge and caves in the Toho Nichigeki Theater with his tail. Then he is next seen in front of the Diet building. Next comes the crushing of the Wako Clock Tower, then he approaches the TV tower and chews down on it (with the Diet building in the background). The next shots show him roaring at the birdcage and his destruction of the "news office" (where Steve Martin was incapacitated). These shots were originally of Godzilla stomping through the wing of the Diet building and incinerating the Matsuzakaya Department Store. In reality the two landmarks are separated by about 4 miles. Essentially in this version Godzilla teleports miles away from shot to shot.
One amazing continuity problem that comes up while recounting the attack scenario in "Godzilla: King of the Monsters" is that Godzilla appears to teleport between places that are miles distant. This oddity can be the result of editing decisions that led to a fragmented perception of the scene and action. Though it doesn't necessarily take away from the film's entertainment value, it does draw attention to how difficult it is to keep complicated action sequences consistently geographically. Observant viewers may get disinterested in the experience due to these details, which serve as a reminder that movies are created. However, the scene highlights Godzilla's enormous strength and the amount of devastation he is capable of wreaking.
Last edited by msmahi on Thu Aug 01, 2024 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

edgaguirus
Sazer
Posts: 10049
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by edgaguirus »

It does effectively show how much danger Godzilla poses. The first attack is a taste of what Godzilla can do, and then the second attack reveals that nothing can contain or stop Godzilla. The electric fence is a spectacular failure. The tank squad is defeated by a wall of flames. Godzilla can even travel great distances without problem. The only thing that can stop a biological doomsday weapon is another doomsday weapon.
Is that so? Where are you going?
Uruguay
Well, you go Uruguay and I'll go mine.

They're here already! You're next! You're next!

User avatar
Jeff-Goldblum2
G-Force Personnel
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 3:36 am

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by Jeff-Goldblum2 »

Where do you stand on the two million years ago issue? When it's stated by Yamane that the Jurassic period was 2 million years ago.

It's a bit unfortunate to have such an inaccuracy in such a fundamental film to the world of prehistoric monster movies.

Legion1979
Justiriser
Posts: 18689
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:45 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by Legion1979 »

Jeff-Goldblum2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 3:02 am
It's a bit unfortunate to have such an inaccuracy in such a fundamental film to the world of prehistoric monster movies.
But is it?

User avatar
UltramanGoji
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 18595
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:40 am

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by UltramanGoji »

Jeff-Goldblum2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 3:02 am Where do you stand on the two million years ago issue?
It's an anachronism from a 70-year old movie. Who cares?
Image

User avatar
Zero One
Yojimbo
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2023 4:22 am

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by Zero One »

Is it just me or is Godzilla 54 more of a horror film than any other kaiju film(not counting the nuclear scare stuff).
Black and White tone.
The score is one of the best and creepy at times
Godzilla's raid on tokyo is very serrious.
The ending
That scene in the lab with the fish tank.
And my fav when slowly goji coming out of tokyo bay

User avatar
Spuro
Keizer
Posts: 9713
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Monster Island

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by Spuro »

UltramanGoji wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 9:38 am
Jeff-Goldblum2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2024 3:02 am Where do you stand on the two million years ago issue?
It's an anachronism from a 70-year old movie. Who cares?
I mean, 70 years ago they still really should have known better. It’s a pretty big fuck up. :lol:
eabaker wrote: You can't parse duende.
Breakdown wrote: HP Lovecraft's cat should be the ultimate villain of the MonsterVerse.

User avatar
MaxRebo320
Futurian
Posts: 3037
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:56 pm
Location: albaquarky
Contact:

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by MaxRebo320 »

You can always pretend the "Two Million Years" line was a slip-up on Yamane's part (just because he's an expert paleontologist doesn't mean he's a great speaker) if it bugs you that damn much.
three wrote:leave me be maxrebo! damn you and your ability to play the game here....

edgaguirus
Sazer
Posts: 10049
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by edgaguirus »

Zero One wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2024 5:01 am Is it just me or is Godzilla 54 more of a horror film than any other kaiju film(not counting the nuclear scare stuff).
Black and White tone.
The score is one of the best and creepy at times
Godzilla's raid on tokyo is very serrious.
The ending
That scene in the lab with the fish tank.
And my fav when slowly goji coming out of tokyo bay
There are two kaiju films that I would consider horror films. The first half of Rodan is one. Gojira, though, is a nightmare all the way to the end.

As to Yamane's slip of the tongue, at least he's no Dr. Arnold calling Godzilla a Tyrannosaur/Stegosaur hybrid.
Is that so? Where are you going?
Uruguay
Well, you go Uruguay and I'll go mine.

They're here already! You're next! You're next!

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 14153
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by JAGzilla »

The two million years line is pretty trivial, but I do see the problem. This film is much more serious, grounded, and all-around well-crafted than the average monster movie of the time, and having a silly inaccuracy like that takes the viewer out of the movie and associates it with its schlockier contemporaries. Not a big deal, I even like it, but it's a chip in the polish if you're looking for perfection.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
LSD Jellyfish
Site Staff
Site Staff
Posts: 17137
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:57 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by LSD Jellyfish »

JAGzilla wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 3:32 pm The two million years line is pretty trivial, but I do see the problem. This film is much more serious, grounded, and all-around well-crafted than the average monster movie of the time, and having a silly inaccuracy like that takes the viewer out of the movie and associates it with its schlockier contemporaries. Not a big deal, I even like it, but it's a chip in the polish if you're looking for perfection.
Until I saw JeffGoldblum2’s post I never even assumed or was aware this was an “inaccuracy”. And to humans, 200 may years versus 2 million or whatever might as well be the same thing. Honestly it’s really silly for anyone to be affected by this, and I agree MaxRebo has a nice “out” for people who are bothered by it. But here’s some other easier explanations:

-Yamane, while an expert in his field, was merely reporting based on what he knew at the time, versus what contemporary paleontology tells us.
Spirit Ghidorah 2010 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2023 4:54 pm Anno-san pleasures me more than Yamasaki-san.

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 11895
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by LegendZilla »

LSD Jellyfish wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 2:35 pm
JAGzilla wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 3:32 pm The two million years line is pretty trivial, but I do see the problem. This film is much more serious, grounded, and all-around well-crafted than the average monster movie of the time, and having a silly inaccuracy like that takes the viewer out of the movie and associates it with its schlockier contemporaries. Not a big deal, I even like it, but it's a chip in the polish if you're looking for perfection.
Until I saw JeffGoldblum2’s post I never even assumed or was aware this was an “inaccuracy”. And to humans, 200 may years versus 2 million or whatever might as well be the same thing. Honestly it’s really silly for anyone to be affected by this, and I agree MaxRebo has a nice “out” for people who are bothered by it. But here’s some other easier explanations:

-Yamane, while an expert in his field, was merely reporting based on what he knew at the time, versus what contemporary paleontology tells us.
I think it's more a matter of the scarceity of knowledge in 1954 when compared to now. Back then, most audiences would've been unaware or oblivious.

edgaguirus
Sazer
Posts: 10049
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by edgaguirus »

If a dinosaur movie made today made that same error, it would be all over the internet.
Is that so? Where are you going?
Uruguay
Well, you go Uruguay and I'll go mine.

They're here already! You're next! You're next!

User avatar
MogeGoji1994
Monarch Researcher
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:44 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by MogeGoji1994 »

Just rewatched this movie the other day with my girlfriend (her first time seeing it!) and something occurred to me. There are multiple scenes of birds in cages and Godzilla passing by these same cages. They seemed deliberate enough given their inclusion in the film, but I do not know of any possible reason for it. I was hoping someone more knowledgeable here could help shine some light upon this.

Edit: another question I have: how was Godzilla's breath created for this movie? Was it simply practical water vapor they used on the set?
Resized Image
You want S.T.A.R.S? I'll give you S.T.A.R.S!
7 minutes. 7 minutes is all I can spare to play with you

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 14153
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by JAGzilla »

I only remember one birdcage scene. I always assumed it was an aviary at a zoo. As for the reason for including that shot, it does just look interesting and the panic of the trapped birds adds to the horror of the situation. Presumably the zoo was a well-known, popular attraction that Japanese audiences would recognize, so it's another Tokyo landmark featured in the rampage.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
canofhumdingers
EDF Instructor
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by canofhumdingers »

A lot of the breath is mist or vapor, but at least some of the longer distance shots of the breath are rotoscope animation.

Image

edgaguirus
Sazer
Posts: 10049
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by edgaguirus »

I know that the close ups of Godzilla's breath was a puppet that shot a stream of mist from the mouth.
Is that so? Where are you going?
Uruguay
Well, you go Uruguay and I'll go mine.

They're here already! You're next! You're next!

User avatar
VaderTyrannus
Ronin
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:17 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #1: Godzilla (1954)

Post by VaderTyrannus »

This just entered my head and I can't stop thinking about it: could this film work as a Twilight Zone episode?

There was an edit of Planet of the Apes that turned it into one. Gojira is kinda similar, using fantastical concepts to symbolize social issues.

Post Reply