wataru wrote:"What's great about the movies, is there is no hard continuity," said editor Bobby Curnow. "The Godzilla movies of the '60s are not necessarily part of the history of Godzilla in the '90s. So the films themselves support this type of approach. No difficult history to get bogged down in. Just jump in and enjoy the ride."
Glad to know Bobby researched Godzilla thoroughly before commenting. The 60s movies have NOTHING to do with the 90s movies. And the 90s movies DO have hard continuity. Even though the time travel is sloppy, it's HARD. Jeez.... Im not buying this.
I swear if you showed Bobby Ninja Scroll and Ninja Resurection, he'd called Resurrection a sequel.
I think you're missing what he's saying here. This is directed to the casual fan/non-fan/new fan, not guys like you or I. What he's pointing out is that as a new reader, you don't need to feel bogged down by almost 60 years of continuity; it isn't a hard continuity as a whole. The 90's DO have continuity, but that's just about it. Outside of some nominal references or nods to the previous films, there's very little continuity in the Showa series, and I know that's a statement that's going to set some people off, but there's just not much there.
The series, as a whole has little HARD continuity. The 90's does, but then sometimes it doesn't. I mean, they tend to ignore anything that happened in RoG. And once you've introduced time travel to a CONTINUOUS story, well, you've got yourself a get out of anything free card. I mean, if they went back and kept Goji from being created until 91 then how was there a Biollante? What about the entire sub-plot to SG involving the soldier and his friend who was killed by Goji? So on an so on...
I love you Wataru, but that was a big leap you took into, "this guy doesn't know anything". And if you showed him Ninja Scroll and Resurrection anybody with half a brain would assume that, yes, they are related. They're marketed and packaged as such and there's nothing in two films that say, DEFINITELY, they aren't related. WE know that because we know, not because we're so insightful...





