Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

For the discussion of video games not produced by, or related to, Toho and their films.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:36 pm

Godzilla 2000 wrote:
Jomei wrote:I don't see what business Karen has lecturing the child who just defeated her on what "truly skilled trainers" should do. I guess it's fitting that a cult of inferior Pokemon players has formed around her laughable words.


So you're saying that the message (use what you like, not what people deem "the best") is a laughable one?

I'm sure all the Smogon players who say Weezing sucks but get walled by it anyway would agree. :P


You're welcome to battle me and find out how good Weezing is. I haven't played in months, but I'll dust off the DS to show you.

I'm all for using Pokemon you like; it's what I do, but you've got to do it wisely. Put Weezing in a metagame and on a team where he can shine. read: not in standard in most cases.
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Legionmaster » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:53 pm

Jomei wrote:I don't see what business Karen has lecturing the child who just defeated her on what "truly skilled trainers" should do. I guess it's fitting that a cult of inferior Pokemon players has formed around her laughable words.

>Implying I was talking about Smogonified competetive battling and not just having fun actually playing the games
bleep bloop
User avatar
Legionmaster
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:33 pm
Location: Skyloft, seducing Peatrice

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Godzilla 2000 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:55 pm

Jomei wrote:
You're welcome to battle me and find out how good Weezing is. I haven't played in months, but I'll dust off the DS to show you.

I'm all for using Pokemon you like; it's what I do, but you've got to do it wisely. Put Weezing in a metagame and on a team where he can shine. read: not in standard in most cases.


Thats kinda what I'm talking about. Competitive players see Weezing and go "lol weezing sucks heatran rapes it." But because they dismiss it as a non-threat, its just that much easier for me to use it.

Its one of those pokemon that people just forget about, and because they forget about it, they arent prepared to stop it when it does rear its ugly head in the game.

I mean, Weezing got Stockpile this gen (which raises DEF and SP. DEF 1 stage). I'd love to see how viable a Max HP, Max SP. DEF Stockpile Weezing would be as a general wall, especially with pokemon like Excadrill and Conkeldurr on the scene.

Still sucks that it doesnt get any good recovery moves though.
Godzilla 2000, The Establisher

http://www.youtube.com/user/UltramanCronos

Proud Toho Kingdom member since 2005.

Halo 4 Gamercard
User avatar
Godzilla 2000
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 4084
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Up and down and all around.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:01 pm

Legionmaster wrote:
Jomei wrote:I don't see what business Karen has lecturing the child who just defeated her on what "truly skilled trainers" should do. I guess it's fitting that a cult of inferior Pokemon players has formed around her laughable words.

>Implying I was talking about Smogonified competetive battling and not just having fun actually playing the games


>implying "competetive" play and having fun are mutually exclusive

You shared your thoughts on Karen; I shared mine. Don't assume my remark has direct bearing on what you thought you were talking about.

@G2k

Excadrill is uber in Smogon tiers, by the way. Not a ban I 100% agreed with, but I don't really miss him, either.

It's cool if you can use Weezing in standard, but it's hard to deny that it's outclassed. If it works and you like it, use it. I just think there are better choices, and I like the vast majority of Pokemon, so I don't find it hard to choose Pokemon that are 1) strong and suited to their role on a team as well as 2) appealing to me aesthetically.
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Legionmaster » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:29 pm

Jomei wrote:>implying "competetive" play and having fun are mutually exclusive

You shared your thoughts on Karen; I shared mine. Don't assume my remark has direct bearing on what you thought you were talking about.


I guess it's fitting that a cult of inferior Pokemon players has formed around her laughable words


The fact that you had the sheer audacity to use such a word, needlessly, belies your claim of removal. It's that kind of attitude that makes a sect of competetive battlers absolute assholes to try and talk to.
bleep bloop
User avatar
Legionmaster
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:33 pm
Location: Skyloft, seducing Peatrice

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:51 pm

It doesn't belie anything. If you were just talking about following Karen philosophy in-game, then what I said doesn't apply to you. I'm talking about the senselessly Smogon-hating, tier-hating, clause-ignorant swarm of Karenites who loudly proclaim their righteousness on Pokemon forums across the internet, chiefly on /vp/ and similar cesspools.

They are the types who cry about Smogon's alleged hypocrisy in banning Swift Swim + Drizzle combos then watch as I climb to #1 on their attempt at a /vp/ server using a Drizzle+Swift Swim team I built in 5 minutes.

They are the types who complain about lack of "originality" when people use "legendaries," not realizing that "legendary" is a completely meaningless status in competitive battling--and that, contrary to their ill-informed perspective, many "legendary" Pokemon are relatively non-threatening.

They are the types who complain about people "whoring" out the strongest Pokemon; because, after all, it's easier to complain than to get better.

If this is not you then just calm your butt.
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby HikizuruBeat » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:08 pm

Godzilla 2000 wrote:
Jomei wrote:I don't see what business Karen has lecturing the child who just defeated her on what "truly skilled trainers" should do. I guess it's fitting that a cult of inferior Pokemon players has formed around her laughable words.


So you're saying that the message (use what you like, not what people deem "the best") is a laughable one?

I'm sure all the Smogon players who say Weezing sucks but get walled by it anyway would agree. :P

That's just assholes in general.
I play smogon rules and Weezing is a good wall.
It's true though not all pokemon are good like sorry to say sunflora is pretty shitty.
TK's resident resident

Crocodile wrote:
Jomei wrote: I lost my virginity at the age of 6 to every single member of the Spice Girls.


Why am I willing to believe this?
User avatar
HikizuruBeat
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:56 pm
Location: Under your bed

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:14 pm

Weezing's not the best choice in OU these days but, interestingly, he can check some major threats pretty well. Terrakion, Landorus, and Dragonite all have a tough time getting around him. The issue is finding a reason to use him over Gliscor, who fills the same role of checking ground/fighting threats while having better things it can do in its own right and a better form of recovery.

Weezing hasn't changed much and has always been a pretty good wall, but he's got tough competition for team spots and some troubling new foes.

edit: lol I also still have a couple screens from battles I had with the last Karenite who was spamming up a thread with his anti-Smogon rhetoric. He objected to Blaziken's ban, so we allowed its use.

Image

... then he said he'd bring his REAL team...

Image
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby HikizuruBeat » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:21 pm

Man I do hate elitist competitive players, but I also find people from the other spectrum ex. people who bitch about competitive battling.
Yeah it's stupid if competitive players think casuals are playing pokemon wrong, but it's just as annoying when casuals bitch about competitive ruining pokemon.

Like serious let people play how they want to. If people don't care about EVs or IVs whatever thats cool, but don't bitch if you lose to a competitive player.
TK's resident resident

Crocodile wrote:
Jomei wrote: I lost my virginity at the age of 6 to every single member of the Spice Girls.


Why am I willing to believe this?
User avatar
HikizuruBeat
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:56 pm
Location: Under your bed

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:25 pm

HikizuruBeat wrote:Man I do hate elitist competitive players, but I also find people from the other spectrum ex. people who bitch about competitive battling.
Yeah it's stupid if competitive players think casuals are playing pokemon wrong, but it's just as annoying when casuals bitch about competitive ruining pokemon.

Like serious let people play how they want to. If people don't care about EVs or IVs whatever thats cool, but don't bitch if you lose to a competitive player.


Exactly. I'm all for live and let live, but when I refer to Karenites, I'm not talking about people who just play casually. I mean people who competitive battle but, in essence, object to people competitive battling better than they do. Or the ones who claim that things like sleep clause are ruining the game for them... when no one is forcing them to play that way. They're free to battle the ten year old down the street if they don't like community-approved rules.
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby zilla103192 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:35 pm

jomei, what site is that?
Don't try to be something else. Don't try to be less. Great things are going to happen in your life. Great things. And with that will come great responsibility.
User avatar
zilla103192
Site Staff
 
Posts: 7963
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:13 pm
Location: Monster Island

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Jomei » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:36 pm

zilla103192 wrote:jomei, what site is that?


You talking about the screen shots? Those are from Pokemon Online, a battle simulator program.
Now it's dark...
Vinyl Kaiju Reviews
User avatar
Jomei
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4574
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Tim85 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:17 am

I don't follow tiers. I just use what Pokemon fits my teams or ones I like. I also don't use legendaries, mainly because it's hard as hell to get the nature you want. I do have a super-legendary team that I use for the console games just in case the rest of my teams aren't up to it, like the final master battle in Battle Revolution.

Scratch my Drought Vulpix request, I got one via GTS! I'm still open for a female Swift Swim Poliwag or Drizzle Politoed. I'm also open for a female Cacnea with Water Absorb if anyone has one.
I was mentioned in the SciFi Japan article about the appearence of extras on the Godzilla vs. Megalon DVD.

http://www.scifijapan.com/articles/2012 ... p-mystery/
User avatar
Tim85
G-Grasper
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:23 am
Location: Fort Madison IA

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby hammysammy59 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:42 am

Tim85 wrote:I don't follow tiers. I just use what Pokemon fits my teams or ones I like. I also don't use legendaries, mainly because it's hard as hell to get the nature you want. I do have a super-legendary team that I use for the console games just in case the rest of my teams aren't up to it, like the final master battle in Battle Revolution.


More or less same here. I just create a balanced team that 1. I like and 2. gives me good type coverage. Granted, I've had to abandon some pokemon that while awesome, just weren't bringing what I needed to fights (Golurk, poison types in general). I also avoid using legendaries because it feels kind of cheap. If I'm really stuck I'll bust out somebody heavy-duty, but I try to avoid it. It works for me, but I rarely battle human players. I mostly play with STAB and call it a day... I'm just not dedicated/care enough to spend hours figuring out IV/EV breeding, and then spending even more time actually doing it.
Haters gonna hate
User avatar
hammysammy59
JXSDF Technician
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby GreenAiden555 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:53 am

Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla diorama!
???? wrote: Monsterarts killed my father and married my mother! They are a threat to the entirety if Godzilla collecting and MUST BE STOPPED AT ALL COSTS BEFORE MORE PEOPLE DIEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
GreenAiden555
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2129
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Legionmaster » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:49 am

Jomei: Misunderstandings cleared up and clarified, and we hate the same peeps. So it's chill. Just one question:

WHY CAN'T I WIN AN OU BATTLE WITH MY TEAM OF SIX DELIBIRDS!?!?!?!?
bleep bloop
User avatar
Legionmaster
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:33 pm
Location: Skyloft, seducing Peatrice

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby Tim85 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:25 am

I was wondering if we can create a topic specifically for trading purposes since those posts tend to get ignored and people could post requests and tell what Pokemon they are willing to trade: particularly Dream World Pokemon.
I was mentioned in the SciFi Japan article about the appearence of extras on the Godzilla vs. Megalon DVD.

http://www.scifijapan.com/articles/2012 ... p-mystery/
User avatar
Tim85
G-Grasper
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:23 am
Location: Fort Madison IA

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby GreenAiden555 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:58 am

Tim85 wrote:I was wondering if we can create a topic specifically for trading purposes since those posts tend to get ignored and people could post requests and tell what Pokemon they are willing to trade: particularly Dream World Pokemon.



I do have one to trade you, but I don't have regular access to my DS systems or games, since I do have a fear of them getting damaged/lost/stolen every time I go back and forth between my dorm and home. However, I am going back tonight, and I do believe I have a few DW Poliwags as spares, and I could trade you one. I will contact you via PM as to not make this thread any bigger, so please only respond to that.
Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla diorama!
???? wrote: Monsterarts killed my father and married my mother! They are a threat to the entirety if Godzilla collecting and MUST BE STOPPED AT ALL COSTS BEFORE MORE PEOPLE DIEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
GreenAiden555
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2129
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby ゴジラ » Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:31 pm

Excuse me Poke-gents, but I do have one more question to ask, at least to those who had experienced most of the pokemon games completely.

I've been reading from experienced players that for those interested in having a powerful Steel Pokemon, that they should obtain an Aron. Saying that in the hands of a good trainer, this pokemon will become a powerful member to use during tough battles. Especially when it becomes an Aggron.

However, some other players feel that its best to obtain an Axew since its both a dragon and steel type pokemon, and is considered more powerful that Aron due to Axew's final stage and how in that stage, in the right hands of a great trainer, that pokemon could take out nearly an entire team of pokemon with levels in the 70's all by itself.

So the question I want to ask is, which is better? I'm highly interesting in obtain one of them, and I understand that they come from different games. But I am curious in knowing which one is better. I don't know what Axew's final form is though, so please excuse my ignorance of not knowing more about that particular pokemon.
User avatar
ゴジラ
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 728
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:47 am
Location: Charlotte North Carolina

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Postby UltramanGoji » Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:35 pm

Axew isn't Dragon and Steel.

It's pure Dragon.

That should rule it out immediately.
Godzillatheultimate wrote:Lincoln is gonna emancipate your balls from your body.


I sell hats for keys, watch a show about colorful horses, and get in fights.
User avatar
UltramanGoji
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:40 am
Location: Teufort

PreviousNext

Return to Video Game Hub

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest