Ethan wrote:I disagree, though I respect such opinion.
I respect your opinion also.
Further elaboration upon this concept would be presented if I already didn't make my assertion.
Ethan wrote:I disagree, though I respect such opinion.
Dave wrote:I will skreeonk hop on a plane, come to your home, log into my account through your computer, and warn you right thar in front of you while I cockslap the shit out of you. Then I'll make myself a sandwich while you huddle in a corner sobbing to yourself.


Berzerkgodzilla wrote:I'd rather have a destructive anti heroic Godzilla with signs of emotion and and intelligence. I'd want him to do what benefits him most (And would generally go in line with somethings the people want)

JKN wrote:I want Godzilla to be seen as a sex symbol, everyone wants to be crushed by his foot because of creepy foot fetishes
NUMQUAM OBLIVISCEMUR MICHAELIS CRICHTONIS
eabaker wrote:Jake Jaguar is asking too many questions about this whole Mulwraygalon affair...

Dynomy84 wrote:Berzerkgodzilla wrote:I'd rather have a destructive anti heroic Godzilla with signs of emotion and and intelligence. I'd want him to do what benefits him most (And would generally go in line with somethings the people want)
Yeah, that sums up what I was gonna say. Godzilla as an Anti-hero makes more sense to me. Reluctant to help mankind, but just battles his opponent for the heck of it. (Or to show that if anything is going to get rid of man kind, it's going to be him.)

bananaoil wrote:I guess you mean like the 90s Gyaos? I could see that working, although it would probably take me a while to get accustomed too.

SpanishBulldog63 wrote:UltramanGoji wrote:Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!
And the other half is fought with a shotgun!


kaiju115 wrote:I would highly recommend Legendary Pictures putting Godzilla back to his original roots as being a destructive force of nature, representing the horrors of nuclear warfare.
Living Corpse wrote:Being underrated and underground is overrated.
Varan Bon Ziller wrote:The lack of Bay is always a plus...

kaiju115 wrote:I would highly recommend Legendary Pictures putting Godzilla back to his original roots as being a destructive force of nature, representing the horrors of nuclear warfare.
Gorosaurus Rex wrote:We've officially reached the state of examining blurry images for clues. I'll go get the Cloverfield monster and Bigfoot over here. They could really help with this.

Godzillaprime05 wrote:Offensive line, as in the entire O line.
SpanishBulldog63 wrote:UltramanGoji wrote:Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!
And the other half is fought with a shotgun!


Godzilla 1995 wrote:kaiju115 wrote:I would highly recommend Legendary Pictures putting Godzilla back to his original roots as being a destructive force of nature, representing the horrors of nuclear warfare.
I like this idea a lot, seeing as the original Gojira is my personal favorite Godzilla film, but I'm not sure if this could be handled properly anymore. To Japan, nuclear weapons were something they had experienced and could put into an art form very well. But for us, it's different. We never have experienced a nuclear disaster like Fukushima or Hiroshima & Nagasaki on our home soil. We haven't seen the horror it causes firsthand, so I don't know if we could give it the depth and seriousness it deserves. Also, avoiding politics would be a hard line to fly. Some country would have to cause Godzilla's mutation with nuclear energy, so which country would be the unlucky one? If it's the US, people will get offended. If it's Iran or North Korea, someone will get offended. If it's Japan, it might be considered insensitive or just make no sense, as Japan has no nuclear weapons(I believe, I can't say this with 100% certainty.)
All in all, the thought it wonderful, but might be to difficult for modern filmmakers. But then again, I just may be cynical.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests