Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

For the discussion of all fantasy matches, Toho or otherwise.

Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Kaiju-King42 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:33 pm

I made this because my last one used a video game character, and I kinda forgot the rules. So I am replacing it with this one.

Spacegodzilla: http://www.tohokingdom.com/kaiju/spacegodzilla.htm#sg

vs

Super Star Destroyer: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Super_Star_Destroyer

Arena: Asteroid Field

Rules: Spacegodzilla has a crystal base set up on a giant asteroid.

Verdict: Given SG's crystal barrier, kaiju level durability, and regeneration, I think he could tank the SSD's weapons, while his EMP's may or may not prove disastrous.

SG 8/10
UltramanGoji wrote:
Brody wrote:Let's say I've been a part of the kaiju community before most of you were allowed on the computer, ask some of the veteran members of kaijuphile who Deoson is.


Ask all of us if we give a shit.
User avatar
Kaiju-King42
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Monster Island

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Gyaos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:34 pm

What class of Star Destroyer?

Depending on which one, the SD takes this EASLY.
TK's resident expert on Fallout, Halo, Terminator, and Gears of War

"Our species is destined to rule Sera, the humans can no longer deny it..."
User avatar
Gyaos
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: The Hollow

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby PopInPicsPresents » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:08 pm

The hell? I'm not a SW buff but wouldn't the EMP shut down the ship leaving it open for Spacegodzilla to suck it dry?
you've stumbled upon my plan yung jedi yoda buy i am the superior hornet molester
User avatar
PopInPicsPresents
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 4176
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:59 am

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby RedZillaKing » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:11 pm

Hell yeah it would... in fact, the Rebels used an electromagnetic pulse to disable one of the Star Destroyers in The Empire Strikes Back.
http://www.importingmonsters.blogspot.com
PiPP wrote:Final Wars 2. Now with 1000% less Bagan and 80% more shitty human drama.
User avatar
RedZillaKing
Kwaidan
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am
Location: Mogeru Pokkiri, Bitches!

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Gyaos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:17 pm

Again it depends on what kind of Star Destroyer. I recall seeing one whos Turbolasers where equivalent to repeated nuclear blasts. Cant they planet bust as well?
TK's resident expert on Fallout, Halo, Terminator, and Gears of War

"Our species is destined to rule Sera, the humans can no longer deny it..."
User avatar
Gyaos
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: The Hollow

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Kaiju-King42 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:02 pm

If they could planet bust, why a Death Star? If they were as powerful as nuclear blasts, why didn't they destroy other ships armor completely when one SSD was destroyed because an A-Wing flew into the command bridge?

In truth, I spent a while trying to look up the power of turbo lasers. The answer I found seems to be slightly less than your average atomic ray. Then I found one stating that it could barely weld enough power to destroy a house, and yet another stating it was city busting power level. What the shreeonk? You know, I don't think that there is an official power level. based on what I saw in the films, I'm gonna have to go with atomic ray power myself.
UltramanGoji wrote:
Brody wrote:Let's say I've been a part of the kaiju community before most of you were allowed on the computer, ask some of the veteran members of kaijuphile who Deoson is.


Ask all of us if we give a shit.
User avatar
Kaiju-King42
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Monster Island

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Gyaos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:06 pm

City busting power is still more than enough to put the hurt on Spacegodzilla. I'll have to get back to you on a definitive max power source since a friend of mine is a hardcore starwars nut.

As for the EMP, this power is starting to become a No-Limit fallacy. Just because it worked on MOGUERA doesnt mean it will work on every single other machine in existance.

I'll admit I may have exaggerated with the planet busting, but I know Star Destroyers in very small numbers can render a planet uninhabitable.
TK's resident expert on Fallout, Halo, Terminator, and Gears of War

"Our species is destined to rule Sera, the humans can no longer deny it..."
User avatar
Gyaos
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: The Hollow

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Berzerkgodzilla » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:09 pm

And there's no proof that the Super Star Destroyer would be immune to it. Spacegodzilla was born in space, it's safe to assume his EMP could work on things other than earth tech. But city busting powers could put a hurt on most Kaiju
I'm the hero Gotham deserves, but doesn't really want.
User avatar
Berzerkgodzilla
G-Grasper
 
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:33 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Kaiju-King42 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:10 pm

Gyaos wrote:City busting power is still more than enough to put the hurt on Spacegodzilla. I'll have to get back to you on a definitive max power source since a friend of mine is a hardcore starwars nut.

As for the EMP, this power is starting to become a No-Limit fallacy. Just because it worked on MOGUERA doesnt mean it will work on every single other machine in existance.

I'll admit I may have exaggerated with the planet busting, but I know Star Destroyers in very small numbers can render a planet uninhabitable.


There's one in every school isn't there? :)
Mine is also a physics/math know-it-all, so I'll get back to you tomorrow as well.
UltramanGoji wrote:
Brody wrote:Let's say I've been a part of the kaiju community before most of you were allowed on the computer, ask some of the veteran members of kaijuphile who Deoson is.


Ask all of us if we give a shit.
User avatar
Kaiju-King42
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Monster Island

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby GojiFan » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:56 pm

The rebels used an ion cannon, not an emp cannon to disable the star destroyers. And yes, they definitely are capable of destroying a city quite easily through bombardment. A collection of them can essentially pull a page out of the Covenant book and destroy the entire surface.

Basically, SG better hope and pray his emp shuts down the super star destroyer. He stands no chance if it doesn't.
Last edited by GojiFan on Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Legionmaster wrote:You can't counter-seduce, women can shut down their libido at will. It's scary fast too. You'll have to do the man version: punch her in the face.
User avatar
GojiFan
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Gyaos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:59 pm

And the thing is it's been generally agreed that Star Destroyers would decimate the Covenant's ships. As much as I love the Covies, a MAC round or two (depending on the class of ship) can put down their ships's shields. A MAC round is nowhere near city busting.
TK's resident expert on Fallout, Halo, Terminator, and Gears of War

"Our species is destined to rule Sera, the humans can no longer deny it..."
User avatar
Gyaos
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: The Hollow

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby RedZillaKing » Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:53 pm

GojiFan wrote:The rebels used an ion cannon, not an esp cannon to disable the star destroyers.

Whoops you're right. Too bad in the SW universe ion cannons and emp weapons are used for the same function and have exactly the same effect. In short SpaceGodzilla is going to land on the 3-19 km ship anfd tear it the f*** apart.
http://www.importingmonsters.blogspot.com
PiPP wrote:Final Wars 2. Now with 1000% less Bagan and 80% more shitty human drama.
User avatar
RedZillaKing
Kwaidan
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am
Location: Mogeru Pokkiri, Bitches!

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby TheDarkone » Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:29 pm

Might i ask how they are the same? Dont Ion cannons fire highly ionized plasma or something weird like that ?

Doesnt sound like the same thing as an Electromagnetic pulse but clarity on the subject would be great.



If the EMP fails then i see the ship winning. If it succeeds i still have my doubts considering the ships armor plating and such
~ i don't have to outrun the bear...I just have to outrun you guys

~ optimus prime is one of my many heroes! if you disagree with him or kill a human he'll rip off your face XD
User avatar
TheDarkone
Yojimbo
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby RedZillaKing » Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:42 pm

They are not "the same". They're used for the same purpose however... Which is disabling electronic systems. As far as armor plating holding up against the Corona beam... As someone said (KK42 wazzat you?) one rebel fighter destroyed the Executor by crashing into it's bridge. Adios, Admiral Piett.
http://www.importingmonsters.blogspot.com
PiPP wrote:Final Wars 2. Now with 1000% less Bagan and 80% more shitty human drama.
User avatar
RedZillaKing
Kwaidan
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am
Location: Mogeru Pokkiri, Bitches!

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby TheDarkone » Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:54 pm

Wasnt the same ship taking repeated beatings from rebel ships which also more than likely have turbolasers? You realize the ships have shielding as well?


Aren't the very same ships made of or atleast somewhat comprised of Durasteel which is somewhere in the neighborhood of 300,000 times stronger than steel? ( Mainly going off of memory so i am not entirely sure )

If anyone more knowledgeable in Star Wars can clarify most of this then please do
~ i don't have to outrun the bear...I just have to outrun you guys

~ optimus prime is one of my many heroes! if you disagree with him or kill a human he'll rip off your face XD
User avatar
TheDarkone
Yojimbo
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby RedZillaKing » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:03 pm

300,000 times stronger than steel... Yet the bridge was vaporized when a fighter smashed into it. I think that number doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Also, the Corona beam could be many times more powerful (certainly many times more versatile) than a laser weapon (and they certainly weren't all turbolasers, I can telly you that). And what of the beast's own shields?

And what's going to stop an 80,000 ton monster from putting his foot through the bridge?
http://www.importingmonsters.blogspot.com
PiPP wrote:Final Wars 2. Now with 1000% less Bagan and 80% more shitty human drama.
User avatar
RedZillaKing
Kwaidan
 
Posts: 5865
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:26 am
Location: Mogeru Pokkiri, Bitches!

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Gyaos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:12 pm

My life isnt complete until someone makes a Spacegodzilla vs Galactic Empire thread.
TK's resident expert on Fallout, Halo, Terminator, and Gears of War

"Our species is destined to rule Sera, the humans can no longer deny it..."
User avatar
Gyaos
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3545
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: The Hollow

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby GojiFan » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:34 pm

RedZillaKing wrote:
GojiFan wrote:The rebels used an ion cannon, not an esp cannon to disable the star destroyers.

Whoops you're right. Too bad in the SW universe ion cannons and emp weapons are used for the same function and have exactly the same effect. In short SpaceGodzilla is going to land on the 3-19 km ship anfd tear it the f*** apart.

It took several shots from a planetary defense weapon to disable a regular Star Destroyer. It's also different than an emp because it is not just waves of electromagnetic radiation, but a concentrated blast that does physical damage to the armor as well.

As for the whole durasteel thing, most Star Wars fighters' armor can take multiple shots from other Star Wars fighters. To put into perspective of what durasteel can take, there is some quote in one of the books that a starfighter's weapons on the lowest possible input could vaporize a human. Anything SG throws at the SSD is going to be like a mosquito bite.

KK 42 wrote:If they could planet bust, why a Death Star? If they were as powerful as nuclear blasts, why didn't they destroy other ships armor completely when one SSD was destroyed because an A-Wing flew into the command bridge?
First, because all capital ships have energy shields. Second, the A-wing crash did not destroy the SSD. It caused the ship to crash into the second Death Star and then it exploded. The bridge is still very much intact. Also, the A-Wing flew through the glass not the durasteel armor of the ship.

In truth, I spent a while trying to look up the power of turbo lasers. The answer I found seems to be slightly less than your average atomic ray. Then I found one stating that it could barely weld enough power to destroy a house, and yet another stating it was city busting power level. What the shreeonk? You know, I don't think that there is an official power level. based on what I saw in the films, I'm gonna have to go with atomic ray power myself.

The problem with the turbolaser argument you brought up is that they are different sizes of turbolasers. AT-AT's use turbolasers as well. But seeing as how this is a SSD, there will be hundreds or maybe even thousands of heavy turbolasers mounted on the ship (which are the city bombarding kind).
Last edited by GojiFan on Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Legionmaster wrote:You can't counter-seduce, women can shut down their libido at will. It's scary fast too. You'll have to do the man version: punch her in the face.
User avatar
GojiFan
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Darkness » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:37 pm

I honestly wasn't that impressed with the Star Destroyers. Since the Super Star Destroyer is so much larger than SpaceGodzilla, I could see him creating a mass of crystals within the ship, destroying it from the inside out. Seems like something he'd do, as it would not only massively damage the ship, but they would also provide him with more energy.
User avatar
Darkness
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:01 pm

Re: Spacegodzilla vs Super Star Destroyer

Postby Kaiju-King42 » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:39 pm

I just thought of something. What if SG attempts to grow crystals on the SSD like with the space station in his movie? Just food for thought.

Edit: Whoops, the guy above me addressed this issue a second before I did.
Last edited by Kaiju-King42 on Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
UltramanGoji wrote:
Brody wrote:Let's say I've been a part of the kaiju community before most of you were allowed on the computer, ask some of the veteran members of kaijuphile who Deoson is.


Ask all of us if we give a shit.
User avatar
Kaiju-King42
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Monster Island

Next

Return to Fantasy Matches

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest