Image Signatures [POLL]

[3000]

Pretty self explanatory... vote above.

[Hedorah]

Bring them back! They were another way of seeing interests people had on here

[Hellspawn28]

Yes and I agree with the rule of no moving sigs. It would be nice to have them back again.

[Godzilla 2000]

Bring them back.

NOW.

[NSZ]

It'd be nice to have something to look at aside from our avies. Moving sigs I understand, those can screw with people with poor connections, but the standard non-moving sigs are harmless. I mean, for those to have an effect on your computer, you must be using something built up in the 90's.

[Legionmaster]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

[TokyoVigilante]

I'm going to say yes, because they always were a nice extra touch. Of course a size limitation (I would say no more then half the length of the actual signature space) and obviously no GIFs. Those were brutal on Dial-up.

[HayesAJones]

I think static image sigs with a limited size would work fine.

[King Caesar]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

So this! I can't say anything else really. Anthony will do what he wants to the site

[Godzilla 2000]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

So this! I can't say anything else really. Anthony will do what he wants to the site

A website isnt much without its community.

Besides, we're not demanding blood sacrifices here. Just images in our sigs.

[Spirit Ghidorah 2010]

Besides, we're not demanding blood sacrifices here.

We're not?

[Godzilla 2000]

Besides, we're not demanding blood sacrifices here.

We're not?

Of course not.

We need to save that for making the FM's a usergroup.

[Showa Gyaos]

I think static image sigs with a limited size would work fine.

This. I don't see the problem with image signatures, so I voted in favor of them. However, should Arbok lay the hammer down on this, I'd be fine without them.

[KaneLocke]

I want 'em back, but I can live without 'em.

If Tony really thinks our input is that important, I'll say bring 'em back.

[Hedorah]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

So this! I can't say anything else really. Anthony will do what he wants to the site

Anthony also once said how he didn't think we needed a 3rd Admin, but we kept demanding it and look what happened.

[omgitsgodzilla]

I kinda liked 'em. I don't really care that much whether they actually are reinstated, but I'm casting a vote in their favor. Helps with character limits too.

[wataru]

..funny I already had a poll to chose one (1): custom titles, FM user group or image sigs and it was locked.

Arbok's opinion on Image Signatures was if enough people wanted them, he'd consider it.

I say no to image sigs, but signature pets and user bars should be allowed.

[JVM]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

Amen.

There's really nothing that special about them. People say it adds individuality and what not but that's what avatars are for. It's really not that big of a deal.

[Hellspawn28]

..funny I already had a poll to chose one (1): custom titles, FM user group

The FM's always dead 90% of the time, I don't think we need a user group. If you don't like AH's thread then post or read them which is why I do with his threads.

[yaburu]

No, because Anthony said so. And he runs the site. And it's funny to watch people keep whining about it.

For once, I agree fully with Legionmaster.