Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

For the discussion of Toho produced and distributed films or shows released from 1999 to 2015.
Post Reply
User avatar
GodzillavsRayquaza
Site Staff
Site Staff
Posts: 6334
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:39 pm

Re: Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

Post by GodzillavsRayquaza »

Alright, just saw this film for the first time in years. I always remembered this as one of my favorites, so did it hold up? Yes.

I enjoyed the human characters a lot. They have clearly defined goals and motivations, they’re all distinct and easily remembered. They’re also some of the most relatable characters in a Godzilla movie.

With most of the series having protagonists that are scientists and/or some other high ranking positions, all of the humans we get to know here are just normal people caught up in something bigger than themselves. The moment where Tachibana is getting in the submarine with the drill missile to attack Godzilla during the final battle is a legitimately emotional moment, especially when it’s showing all of the other characters we’ve seen throughout the movie watching the events on TV with bated breath.

The monsters are all great. Godzilla and Baragon’s battle is an intense one which shows off the two perfectly. Godzilla is a sadistic juggernaut, nigh unstoppable, but not incapable of strategy. Baragon is a tenacious and cunning creature, willing to charge into battle when he’s clearly out matched, and being able to still put up a fight.

The final battle between Godzilla, Mothra, and Ghidorah is amazing from start to finish, in my opinion some of the best monster action in the genre. Throughout the movie the kaiju’s every action has caused mayhem and destruction, and so do they here. Both guardians are also clearly outmatched, but still they fight, and do very well all things considered.

A lot of people have issue with King Ghidorah here, but i’ve never minded it. If Godzilla is such a flexible character, why shouldn’t the other monsters be?

The effects are amazing.

I only really have two major complaints. I honestly wish the guardian monsters could have done more to Godzilla. I mean, the ancient mystical gods throw everything they have at him, and all they can do is give him a little shoulder wound? King Ghidorah hit him with an explosion bigger than the both of them combined!

Also, the movie could do with a little thing called subtlety. Kaneko does not leave a thing related to the film’s messages up to interpretation, which in some cases works, but in other cases just feels like we’re being beaten over the head with it.
Last edited by GodzillavsRayquaza on Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
KWC Co-Operations Manager
KWCE Administrator


ShinGojira14 wrote: Neither. Hideki Anno wins because he writes a hilarious comedic satire movie where Shin and Legendary have to team up to destroy a grotesque crap-monster created by the constant toxic bickering of Shin fans and Legendary fans.
SoggyNoodles2016 wrote: Yup, my dad works at Legendary, the Nebulans are gonna be in the next movie and they're gonna get beat because Madison throws coffee in the leaders face.

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

Hey guys, LegendZilla here once again. Today I would like to start a thread dedicated to a rather controversial subject among the community of fans. That being those with the opinion of the 25th entry of the Godzilla film series, Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah : Giant Monsters all out Attack, (or just GMK for short) that does not fully or even at all resonate with that of the masses. I just so happen to be among the film’s most staunch detractors myself.

I noticed that a short while ago, someone attempted a thread proclaiming this as the worst film in the franchise. While I understand the statement I think we can go further into this subject like the devoted fans we are. My reasons for disliking the film is that Kaneko decided to turn Godzilla flat-out evil as opposed to being a destructive, yet ultimately tragic and misunderstood beast. My other major gripe is Mothra and Ghidorah being tacked on simply because audiences were a bunch of picky crybabies imho, that combined with the fact the latter who has long since been established as a purely malevolent entity suddenly turned into being good. Toho seriously believed that going Bizzaro World with their well-known creations was a small price to pay for marque value. Feel free to unleash your constructive criticism.
Last edited by LegendZilla on Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:29 pm, edited 9 times in total.

User avatar
GodzillaFan1990's
Sazer
Posts: 12275
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 1:11 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by GodzillaFan1990's »

Erm...You do realize this is the 1954 Godzilla being reanimated and possessed by the spirits of WWII right? It's really not Godzilla overall, he's being done against his own will.

As for King Ghidorah. If it makes you better. He wasn't always good. He's the Yamata no Orochi in this Godzilla timeline who was eventually defeated and forced into becoming this eventual guardian. Something around those lines. This was revealed in some source material someone on this site shared to me. Even then King Ghidorah was never considered in the first place. He only happened because Toho pressured Kaneko into using him and Mothra instead of Anguirus and Varan since they'd exploit more money and more well known.
Last edited by GodzillaFan1990's on Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:30 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
GodzillaFan1990's
Sazer
Posts: 12275
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 1:11 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: GMK-worst film of the series:

Post by GodzillaFan1990's »

MandaSaurus wrote:My ONE issue with GMK was the casting of King Ghiddy as a 'Guardian Monster', which is akin to casting The Joker as a good guy, which just doesn't work. Overall, the movie is pretty good. WORST film of the Millennium Series easily goes to Final Wars, which tries to come off as a homage/satire, but just ends up as a big mess - with a lot of explosions - and was the movie that killed off Big G - in Japan - for the next 12 years! You can't credit GMK with a crime like THAT...
Well as you may know. King Ghidorah was never considered but apparently Toho pressured Kaneko into using him and Mothra instead of Anguirus and Varan.

If it also makes you any better. This incarnation of King Ghidorah hasn't always been good. In fact he was the Yamata no Orochi before eventually being defeated and made into a guardian monster, something around those lines.

Feel better now? :P

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

GodzillaFan1990's wrote:Erm...You do realize this is the 1954 Godzilla being reanimated and possessed by the spirits of WWII right? It's really not Godzilla overall, he's being done against his own will.

As for King Ghidorah. If it makes you better. He wasn't always good. He's the Yamata no Orochi in this Godzilla timeline who was eventually defeated and stored away becoming this eventual guardian. Something around those lines. This was revealed in some source material someone on this site shared to me.
That’s another problem with the film I have. I seriously don’t know what Kaneko was thinking when he decided to incorporate the whole “lost-souls” nonsense into the Godzilla mythos. As for Ghidorah, the fact that the role in the film was not even meant for the character in the first place is enough to discredit it all together.

User avatar
GodzillaFan1990's
Sazer
Posts: 12275
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 1:11 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by GodzillaFan1990's »

LegendZilla wrote:That’s another problem with the film I have. I seriously don’t know what Kaneko was thinking when he decided to incorporate the whole “lost-souls” nonsense into the Godzilla mythos. As for Ghidorah, the fact that the role in the film was not even meant for the character in the first place is enough to discredit it all together.
The way I saw it. That was the central theme for the movie. It was taking more of an mystical and mythology approach which I admit was a really cool take IMO. Change and being different is sometimes a good thing which IMO is the case with this.

I still do agree with King Ghidorah though but again remember, it was done against Kaneko's will as Toho pressured him until he agreed. So don't be blaming him, if anything blame Toho which it isn't their fault that they're just trying to make money by exploiting their more famous and recognizable Toho monsters. Around this time Godzilla films weren't doing too well in the box office and so they were trying to get a good buck however way they could.
Last edited by GodzillaFan1990's on Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
eabaker
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13758
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:16 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by eabaker »

LegendZilla wrote:the Godzilla mythos.
I think one place where some people differ in their take on this is in their view on whether or not there is a unified "Godzilla mythos." To my mind, there is nothing about Godzilla as a character/franchise that inherently rules out a supernatural element like the one in GMK, nor does its presence there have any implications for the series as a whole, beyond saying, "So, this is one more thing we can draw from, if and when it serves the story."
Tokyo, a smoldering memorial to the unknown, an unknown which at this very moment still prevails and could at any time lash out with its terrible destruction anywhere else in the world.

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

^How would you people feel if DC hired a writer for a new Batman story who added a ‘new element’ that involved Batman acquiring abilities by being bitten by a radioactive bat? Would that not change the very essence of who the character is? For me that is what tying Godzilla with lost souls is. For me that is what GMK does to the character into a science fiction into a fantasy creature.
Last edited by LegendZilla on Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
UltramanGoji
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 17762
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:40 am

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by UltramanGoji »

You really couldn't just put this in the actual GMK thread? You had to make a separate thread?
LegendZilla wrote:My reasons for disliking the film is that Kaneko decided to turn Godzilla flat-out evil as opposed to being a destructive, yet ultimately tragic and misunderstood beast. My other major gripe is Mothra and Ghidorah being tacked on simply because audiences were a bunch of picky crybabies imho, that combined with the fact the latter who has long since been established as a purely malevolent entity suddenly turned into being good. Toho seriously believed that going Bizzaro World with their well-known creations was a small price to pay for marque value. Feel free to unleash your constructive criticism.
So basically...nothing in terms of how the film actually uses these ideas.

Why not judge the film on how it develops these ideas rather than endlessly moan about how it could've been different? It will never change so there's no use getting worked up about it.
Image

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

UltramanGoji wrote:You really couldn't just put this in the actual GMK thread? You had to make a separate thread?
I think that thread is best reserved for the majority of fans who praise it. I would rather have this thread be it’s own thing.
Last edited by LegendZilla on Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
UltramanGoji
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 17762
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:40 am

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by UltramanGoji »

LegendZilla wrote:
UltramanGoji wrote:You really couldn't just put this in the actual GMK thread? You had to make a separate thread?
I think that thread is best reserved for the majority of fans who praise it.
No, that's not how it works. It's not an appreciation thread, it's a discussion thread. As in, both sides of the issue.
Image

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

UltramanGoji wrote:
LegendZilla wrote:
UltramanGoji wrote:You really couldn't just put this in the actual GMK thread? You had to make a separate thread?
I think that thread is best reserved for the majority of fans who praise it.
No, that's not how it works. It's not an appreciation thread, it's a discussion thread. As in, both sides of the issue.
I think that thread would become a tad too crowded even if the staff were to merge this one with it.

User avatar
eabaker
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13758
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:16 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by eabaker »

LegendZilla wrote:^How would you people feel if DC hired a writer for a new Batman story who added a ‘new element’ that involved Batman acquiring abilities by being bitten by a radioactive bat? Would that not change the very essence of who the character is? For me that is what tying Godzilla with lost souls is. For me that is what GMK does to the character into a science fiction into a fantasy creature.
But there are a ton of alternate takes on major superhero characters. None of them redefine the work of other authors, because they're just that, alternate takes.

How Kaneko chose to present Godzilla in GMK in no way redefines how Godzilla is presented in every other movie.

Also, even in GMK, Godzilla is not redefined as a fantasy creature; he's still the same sci-fi Godzilla, interacting with a fantasy elements.
Tokyo, a smoldering memorial to the unknown, an unknown which at this very moment still prevails and could at any time lash out with its terrible destruction anywhere else in the world.

User avatar
MechaGoji Bro7503
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6117
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:02 pm
Location: Black Hole Planet 3 branch of Majima Construction.
Contact:

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by MechaGoji Bro7503 »

Really? We already have like a dozen threads similar to this.

Oh no something new and creative for the franchise!!

Honestly, if anything this film took an aspect of Godzilla and decided to explore it. I honestly like that King Ghidorah was a hero for once, it was refreshing- also going by that logic they disrespected the original Baragon from Frankenstein vs Baragon. Also we really should stop with all these analogies to superheroes. These are kaiju.
"Bang on, mate.", - Murdoc Niccals 2018.

"Right, wrong... Nobody's got a clue what the difference is in this town. So I'm gonna have more fun... and live crazier than any of 'em." - Goro Majima.

Our G-Force a Kaiju Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/g ... 1509725595

For unique discussions on Ultraman, Godzilla, and much more check out my channel Tiger Drop Films: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCng0uL ... VCg/videos

User avatar
GodzillavsJason
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9878
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Location: The Movies

Re: Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

Post by GodzillavsJason »

Agreed! Let's stop making ideas for threads when you can easily just put them in preexisting ones.
52 wins and 27 loses
TK's Number 1 Fan of Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Evil Dead, The Thing, and Red vs Blue!

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 10373
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by LegendZilla »

eabaker wrote:
LegendZilla wrote:^How would you people feel if DC hired a writer for a new Batman story who added a ‘new element’ that involved Batman acquiring abilities by being bitten by a radioactive bat? Would that not change the very essence of who the character is? For me that is what tying Godzilla with lost souls is. For me that is what GMK does to the character into a science fiction into a fantasy creature.
But there are a ton of alternate takes on major superhero characters. None of them redefine the work of other authors, because they're just that, alternate takes.

How Kaneko chose to present Godzilla in GMK in no way redefines how Godzilla is presented in every other movie.

Also, even in GMK, Godzilla is not redefined as a fantasy creature; he's still the same sci-fi Godzilla, interacting with a fantasy elements.
How does adding Aliens into the mix of Indiana Jones take away from that said franchise?

User avatar
eabaker
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13758
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:16 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The GMK detractors’ thread

Post by eabaker »

LegendZilla wrote:
eabaker wrote:
LegendZilla wrote:^How would you people feel if DC hired a writer for a new Batman story who added a ‘new element’ that involved Batman acquiring abilities by being bitten by a radioactive bat? Would that not change the very essence of who the character is? For me that is what tying Godzilla with lost souls is. For me that is what GMK does to the character into a science fiction into a fantasy creature.
But there are a ton of alternate takes on major superhero characters. None of them redefine the work of other authors, because they're just that, alternate takes.

How Kaneko chose to present Godzilla in GMK in no way redefines how Godzilla is presented in every other movie.

Also, even in GMK, Godzilla is not redefined as a fantasy creature; he's still the same sci-fi Godzilla, interacting with a fantasy elements.
How does adding Aliens into the mix of Indiana Jones take away from that said franchise?
It doesn't.
Tokyo, a smoldering memorial to the unknown, an unknown which at this very moment still prevails and could at any time lash out with its terrible destruction anywhere else in the world.

User avatar
LSD Jellyfish
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 14555
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:57 pm

Re: Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

Post by LSD Jellyfish »

I don’t see how complaining Mothra and King Ghidorah replaces Varan and Anguruius is a real criticism of the quality of the film. Would it have been nice to see Vara? I suppose.

GMK has some of the best shots, best military action, best and varied fights, best music in the entire franchise. Admit it when Godzilla first appears both underwater and in the bay it’s pretty epic, and you get a real OH FUCK moment. The lead and the dynamic with her father was interesting to, and the concept of going into Godzilla with a sub to kill him is neat.

The reason why I don’t mind Ghidorah being good is because he’s a dragon:hydra/Yamato no Orochi. It’s not hard taking something like Ghidorah and making it a fantastical Beast. Plus Ghidorah was handled way better than the Heisei incarnation so yeah.

As for Godzilla, he actually looks way closer to his original 54 and Heisei look than the other millenniums, so you can’t argue he has a controversial redesign. On top of that he has fins, is incredibly durable, and fires a destructive beam as well as lives underwater. The tie into ghosts and soldiers can seem odd, but actually it fits right into Godzilla being some sort of metaphor or representation of Japanese zietgiests.

I think people who hate or dislike this film are pretty much being hateful hipsters. As someone who likes GFW at this point I get why people don’t like it, but I think GMK is one of those films you can’t say is bad. Same for things like 54, Mothra Vs Godzilla, or even Shin.
Spirit Ghidorah 2010 wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 4:54 pm Anno-san pleasures me more than Yamasaki-san.

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 11895
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

Post by JAGzilla »

Alternate takes and new ideas have always been an essential component of the franchise's success and survival. Before you complain about a departure from tradition in a modern entry, remember that some of the most beloved, iconic Godzilla movies of the '60s (KKvsG, GTTHM, GvsMZ, etc.) were radically different from Godzilla's grim, black-and-white origins in the '50s. I'm sure a lot of fans back then were scratching their heads and griping, but that willingness on Toho's part to risk changing things up is undoubtedly a big reason that the series is still around.

*goes back to seething over murderous Batman in BvS*
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
Zarm
E.S.P.Spy
Posts: 4973
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:21 pm
Location: USA, East Coast
Contact:

Re: Talkback: GMK - Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah (2001)

Post by Zarm »

And yet, it is quite possible to be open to new takes on a property and simply not enjoy a particular new take. Which is where I think a lot of straw man criticisms of fan dislike for a new entry come in (especially over The Last Jedi). Just because something is new and different doesn't automatically make it good.

Or, in the case of GMK, you can appreciate the bew direction and the concept and even some of the execution but still think that its tone doesn't work, its style is over-the-top, undercutting its message in a juvenile attempt to be 'edgy', and almost its violence is almost sadistic, and because of those factors, consider it not to be a great movie, despite the intriguing concepts at play and the very strong effects work. (Which, incidentally, is my non-hipster reason for not caring for GMK as much as I do some of the other entries.) ;)

Added in 12 minutes 19 seconds:
LSD Jellyfish wrote:Admit it when Godzilla first appears both underwater and in the bay it’s pretty epic, and you get a real OH skreeonk moment.
Definitely. Probably my favorite moment in the film...
KaijuCanuck wrote:It’s part of my secret plan to create a fifth column in the US, pre-emoting our glorious conquest and the creation of the Canadian Empire, upon which the sun will consistently set after less than eight hours of daylight. :ninja:
The grace of God is a greater gift than we can truly fathom; undeserved mercy is a kindness humbling in its sheer scope.

The Zone Fighter campaign is complete, with all episodes subtitled! PM me if you need a link location.

Maranatha!

Post Reply