Amen~!Cimmerian Dragon wrote:The purpose of the scene is to show the details of the operation on Katsura. The purpose of the exposed chest is to contrast a realistic, generally pleasant aspect of human anatomy with the artificial and decidedly unpleasant machinery which that appealing surface-layer conceals.
And why is that?Rody wrote: I don't like nudity in films to start with.
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
Boobs are where girls make cooties. Blech.Goji wrote:And why is that?Rody wrote: I don't like nudity in films to start with.
One thing I have always wondered was whether they were supposed to be her real boobs, or actual cover ups, and plastic ones to hide her machinery.menschenjaeger wrote:Yup! I watched the commentary and they flat-out say it.
The plastic boobs in the Japanese version were pretty hilarious - why bother? Also, I never knew there was a schizo American edit AND a sensible one. It's nice to have a linear English version for when I feel like snickering at dubbing.
three wrote:leave me be maxrebo! damn you and your ability to play the game here....
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
I'm no expert on the subject, but I think religion has something to do with it. After all, religion did play a large part in shaping society into what it is today.Cimmerian Dragon wrote: Listen, you can like or dislike what you want. However, until men are required to cover their nipples, it's pretty foolish to ask women to do so. It's the same darn body part, right down to the ability to lactate (as Scientific American showed showed on the previous page). I'll never understand why folks find the human body so disturbing. I remember when Watchmen came out, and all my male friends did was bitch about seeing Dr. Manhattan's penis. Why? Don't you have one? Does your own rod offend you when you catch a glimpse of it? For the love of all that's holy, it's all just epidermis! Why are some parts of our anatomy considered so horrifying, but others, like the elbow or belly-button, are not? Is it just because there are orifices involved? Then why not censor nostrils? Boogers bother me a lot more than butt cheeks.
Sigh. I'll probably never understand this.
eabaker wrote: You can't parse duende.
Breakdown wrote: HP Lovecraft's cat should be the ultimate villain of the MonsterVerse.
With obesity on the rise, maybe you should be.Cimmerian Dragon wrote:but I'm also not morally opposed to the sight of the human posterior.
Berzerkgodzilla wrote:It shouldn't be looked down upon in real life. What's the big deal with nudity? Oh, she's showing a natural part of her body! So horrible! Think of the children! I've never quite understood what the big problem with nudity is
Goji wrote:It's "looked down upon" by whom? American prudes? Parents of sheltered teenagers? Asexual human beings?
I like you Rody, so I'll just cut this short. I don't want to get on your bad side any more than I probably already have.
Pretty much, and because of that, there is absolutely no way this problem will ever turn around. Not in our life time, not even the life time after that.Kaiju-King42 wrote:I'm no expert on the subject, but I think religion has something to do with it. After all, religion did play a large part in shaping society into what it is today.Cimmerian Dragon wrote: Listen, you can like or dislike what you want. However, until men are required to cover their nipples, it's pretty foolish to ask women to do so. It's the same darn body part, right down to the ability to lactate (as Scientific American showed showed on the previous page). I'll never understand why folks find the human body so disturbing. I remember when Watchmen came out, and all my male friends did was bitch about seeing Dr. Manhattan's penis. Why? Don't you have one? Does your own rod offend you when you catch a glimpse of it? For the love of all that's holy, it's all just epidermis! Why are some parts of our anatomy considered so horrifying, but others, like the elbow or belly-button, are not? Is it just because there are orifices involved? Then why not censor nostrils? Boogers bother me a lot more than butt cheeks.
Sigh. I'll probably never understand this.
[/quote]Cimmerian Dragon wrote:Yeah, I don't exactly have the ass of an Olympian myself.
But something not being attractive to look at isn't the same as being some kind of moral sin. If it was, Michael Moore could never leave his basement.
Chris55 wrote:That's not true. C3PO had a red arm.Underworld54 wrote:I very much consider TFA to be half-assed. What a generic film which only fed on nostalgia, it brought nothing new to the table.GalacticPetey wrote:They're not half-assing the Star Wars movies.
three wrote:leave me be maxrebo! damn you and your ability to play the game here....
*Opens mouth to say something, but couldn't*edgaguirus wrote:Well, kaiju don't wear clothes for one thing.
