Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

For the discussion of Toho produced and distributed films or shows released before 1980.

Re: DAM question

Postby Cimmerian Dragon » Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:39 am

Tohosaurus wrote:Yeah. Frankly, Manda, Varan, and Baragon ought not to have been in the film at all, but whatever. Maybe the new DVD and BD releases will give me a new found appreciation for it. :D


Hey...Manda was cool in Atragon, and her (his/its?) serpentine attack on the bridge in DAM is one of the few semi-original moments of destruction in the picture.
NUMQUAM OBLIVISCEMUR MICHAELIS CRICHTONIS

eabaker wrote:Jake Jaguar is asking too many questions about this whole Mulwraygalon affair...
User avatar
Cimmerian Dragon
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 4594
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 7:28 am
Location: Utica, NY

Re: DAM question

Postby edgaguirus » Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:06 pm

Agreed.

DAM was designed to showcase as many monsters as possible. Even if some monsters could not be well represented, they still wanted them in the film.
edgaguirus
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Killswitch » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:13 am

Better yet, have two King Ghidorah's. Just as the Earth Monsters have KG at the edge of defeat, another KG appears.
User avatar
Killswitch
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Godz » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:55 am

NebulaMSpacehunter wrote:Budget and tech doesn't really have much to do with getting all ten monsters to fight Ghidrah, they had all the suits there so all you needed was them to go at it, so I don't know why they decided not to have all the monsters fight. Maybe they were just too rushed to film a giant action scene like that.


Tech does kinda matter, if you think about it.

Why do you think Rodan flew away the second the fight started? IMO, it's wirework. You've already got wires manipulating all the kaiju's tails, King Ghidorah's necks, the entirety of Kumonga, etc....for Rodan to do anything but stand there and flap his wings would be impossible, so that takes him out of the equation, sadly.

Manda is little more than a glorified marionette, who's only contribution could've been biting or constricting Ghidorah....and that kind of wirework is not conducive to a big brawl, eliminating his usefulness in this scene.

Sadly, as is common knowledge in the fandom, the Baragon suit was not screen-ready in time, which is why only a silly looking puppet head is seen before the fight. I wish they could've delayed the scene long enough to get him involved, but, alas.

If Legion is correct above, only a prop of Varan was around, which would explain his activity (or lack thereof)

Some of this is purely speculation on my part, so, feel free to correct any of it should it require it.
User avatar
Godz
Site Staff
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:45 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Killswitch » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:39 am

Godz wrote:
NebulaMSpacehunter wrote:Budget and tech doesn't really have much to do with getting all ten monsters to fight Ghidrah, they had all the suits there so all you needed was them to go at it, so I don't know why they decided not to have all the monsters fight. Maybe they were just too rushed to film a giant action scene like that.


Tech does kinda matter, if you think about it.

Why do you think Rodan flew away the second the fight started? IMO, it's wirework. You've already got wires manipulating all the kaiju's tails, King Ghidorah's necks, the entirety of Kumonga, etc....for Rodan to do anything but stand there and flap his wings would be impossible, so that takes him out of the equation, sadly.

Manda is little more than a glorified marionette, who's only contribution could've been biting or constricting Ghidorah....and that kind of wirework is not conducive to a big brawl, eliminating his usefulness in this scene.

Sadly, as is common knowledge in the fandom, the Baragon suit was not screen-ready in time, which is why only a silly looking puppet head is seen before the fight. I wish they could've delayed the scene long enough to get him involved, but, alas.

If Legion is correct above, only a prop of Varan was around, which would explain his activity (or lack thereof)

Some of this is purely speculation on my part, so, feel free to correct any of it should it require it.


This is one of the main reasons I favor CGI. There would be no restrictions, and the monsters would be fluid in their movements.
User avatar
Killswitch
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Goji » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:45 am

Are you serious? The charm of these kind of films then goes straight out the window. Besides, we're talking about a film that was made 43 years ago. CGI wasn't an option.
User avatar
Goji
E.S.P.Spy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:37 pm
Location: The Overlook Hotel

Re: DAM question

Postby Killswitch » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:02 am

Goji wrote:Are you serious? The charm of these kind of films then goes straight out the window. Besides, we're talking about a film that was made 43 years ago. CGI wasn't an option.


I'm a 60's Showa fan, so you don't have to explain the charm of those films to me. But, we have a lot of members on this forum that want the genre to remain with that old technology. I think its time to move forward and use modern effects. Suits & strings are too restrictive.
User avatar
Killswitch
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Tamura » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:19 am

IMO, CGI restricts imagination.
GojirO wrote:THIS IS OUR CHRISTMAS
User avatar
Tamura
Futurian
 
Posts: 1908
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:32 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Chris55 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:42 am

Tamura wrote:IMO, CGI restricts imagination.


I don't think so. Whatever's needed to bring any idea to life is worth doing
User avatar
Chris55
Site Staff
 
Posts: 4902
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby bananaoil » Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:42 pm

CGI and Suits used in unison, one complementing the other, is the answer.
Daikaiju is better with rainbows!!!
bananaoil
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby NebulaMSpacehunter » Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:38 pm

I've never been a big fan of CGI, the technology itself seems itself take the life out of the monsters(or whatever it is) and it's often abused to the point where it makes me numb to the (SUUUPPPERRR EXTREME CG) action and detaches me from the suspence
User avatar
NebulaMSpacehunter
Ronin
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:56 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Showa Gyaos » Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:24 pm

Tamura wrote:IMO, CGI restricts imagination.

How so? I'm not against suitmation, but CGI can display realism more effectively.
yaburu wrote:I swear, one of these days, these trolls are going to pull a skreeonk Voltron and combine themselves into one mega-troll.
User avatar
Showa Gyaos
Kwaidan
 
Posts: 5640
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:06 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: DAM question

Postby Living Corpse » Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:03 pm

Again I ask, what wrong with a blend of both?
Varan Bon Ziller wrote:....What ever happened to the innocence of monster banging others brains out...
Living Corpse
Terminated
Terminated
 
Posts: 13267
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:32 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby Godz » Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:49 am

Living Corpse wrote:Again I ask, what wrong with a blend of both?


Nothing, but until Toho (and moviemakers in general) regain their lost spirit/imagination, we'll get shit like Final Wars that no amount of special effects trickery can improve..
User avatar
Godz
Site Staff
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:45 pm

Re: DAM question

Postby edgaguirus » Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:05 pm

Showa Gyaos wrote:How so? I'm not against suitmation, but CGI can display realism more effectively.


The right CGI can. I've seen some terrible CGI effects.
edgaguirus
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

Postby Shazam14 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:52 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:
King Caesar wrote:^ That was Zilla who did that (according to GMK and GFW)...but yeah that is kinda funny.
..


Yeah funny that Godzilla attacks NYC in this movie in year 1999, and in 1998 the American Godzilla attacks NYC. It's like one year later, NYC gets attack by the real Godzilla :P :lol:.


Has anyone noticed that Minilla's 32 frickin years old in this movie and he's still a baby. Son of Godzilla takes place in 1967 and Destroy All Monsters takes place in 1999.
You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.

Ponies > Riders > Dragons
User avatar
Shazam14
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3859
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: New York

Re: Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

Postby Space Hunter M » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:55 pm

Shazam14 wrote:Has anyone noticed that Minilla's 32 frickin years old in this movie and he's still a baby. Son of Godzilla takes place in 1967 and Destroy All Monsters takes place in 1999.


Because we all know that continuity is one of the Godzilla franchise's strongest points. :P

I believe there is already a topic addressing this issue.
TK's only diehard RMA King Arthur series historian
"All you did was download the ROMs anyway! You can hardly call yourself a real fan!"
User avatar
Space Hunter M
Futurian
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Rummaging the ruins of the west coast for the master files of "Oops! We Broke the Table!"

Re: Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

Postby Shazam14 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:02 pm

Space Hunter M wrote:
Shazam14 wrote:Has anyone noticed that Minilla's 32 frickin years old in this movie and he's still a baby. Son of Godzilla takes place in 1967 and Destroy All Monsters takes place in 1999.


Because we all know one of the Godzilla franchise's strongest points is continuity. :P


It would have been cool to see what Minilla would have looked like as an adult. Maybe he'd be less hideous.
You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.

Ponies > Riders > Dragons
User avatar
Shazam14
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3859
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: New York

Re: Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

Postby Lord Gappa » Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:14 pm

Shazam14 wrote:
Space Hunter M wrote:
Shazam14 wrote:Has anyone noticed that Minilla's 32 frickin years old in this movie and he's still a baby. Son of Godzilla takes place in 1967 and Destroy All Monsters takes place in 1999.


Because we all know one of the Godzilla franchise's strongest points is continuity. :P


It would have been cool to see what Minilla would have looked like as an adult. Maybe he'd be less hideous.

We don't know exactly how giant monsters age and grow.
yaburu wrote:Oh knock it off ya bunch of wussies. Jerking off to a dead porn star is honoring her memory and legacy. You''re giving her your own 180 million-gun salute.


TK's resident bystander.
User avatar
Lord Gappa
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2567
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:40 pm
Location: Zenith

Re: Talkback Thread #9: Destroy All Monsters (1968)

Postby Shazam14 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:24 pm

Still 32 years? Junior has been growing since he first appeared. Hell, even Sanda grew pretty fast. :P
You have your fear, which might become reality; and you have Godzilla, which IS reality.

Ponies > Riders > Dragons
User avatar
Shazam14
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3859
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: New York

PreviousNext

Return to Showa Series (30's-70's)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests