TokyoVigilante wrote:While they are repetitive, they are all really distinct;
Xilians want to turn Earth into a colony for its water supply.
Kilaaks suck and have no reason for almost anything they ever did.
The Nebulans wanted to committed Galactic genocide to achieve world peace (and preserve the children? Kill them more humanely?)
The Seatopians attacked out of vengeance.
The Simians were losing their planet to the gravitational pull of a black hole and wanted Earth for a new planet.
Living Corpse wrote:Being underrated and underground is overrated.
Varan Bon Ziller wrote:The lack of Bay is always a plus...

TokyoVigilante wrote:While they are repetitive, they are all really distinct;
Xilians want to turn Earth into a colony for its water supply.
Kilaaks suck and have no reason for almost anything they ever did.
The Nebulans wanted to committed Galactic genocide to achieve world peace (and preserve the children? Kill them more humanely?)
The Seatopians attacked out of vengeance.
The Simians were losing their planet to the gravitational pull of a black hole and wanted Earth for a new planet.

shinmattiathekaiju wrote:
Kilaaks wanted a hot planet.
Distinct for us, probably. I mean I find each alien race distinct myself but if I watch it with far more casual friends, it's more like "So the plot is aliens again?"
I just watched Battle in Outer Space with the commentary on last night. Makes me smile because NOTHING looks real.
TokyoVigilante wrote:shinmattiathekaiju wrote:
Kilaaks wanted a hot planet.
Is that something that didn't get mentioned in the International dub? skreeonk ADV copy. But they're still the blandest and least visually interesting invaders that ever came from Toho.
Living Corpse wrote:Being underrated and underground is overrated.
Varan Bon Ziller wrote:The lack of Bay is always a plus...

TokyoVigilante wrote:Is that something that didn't get mentioned in the International dub? skreeonk ADV copy. But they're still the blandest and least visually interesting invaders that ever came from Toho.
That's just a case of people watering down the plots and not paying attentions to the details of the movie they're watching; these aren't even finer details, their motivations are often in the basic synopsis of the film in question. It would be like if I marathoned the Harry Potter films and groaned "Uugh, Hogwarts and Voldemort again?"
Battle in Outer Space is an enjoyable little sci-fi boggle. It's not really notable and mostly forgettable, but it's an breezy little alien invasion movie.

Tohosaurus wrote:A watered down plot, yes, I can buy that. But at the same time they're right in that sense. I don't like Harry Potter films and part of it is because it seems same old, and since I'm not really a fan of that type of fantasy to begin with that makes me less likely to really search for the details or differences, so I can imagine that's what would turn off would-be fans of the Godzilla Showa universe, or at least keep them from being as appreciated as we do (holy run on sentence, Batman!). Just my guess. I mean at the end of the day, as I said, I still like the films. I can't think of any of the alien plot films that I'd rather have killed or changed. Still, I have to admit that it's part of my affinity for the films as it is that allows me to appreciate it more. I'm sure Ghidorah and Astro Monster being right next to each other with a similar plot and set of monsters would be boring to many.
TokyoVigilante wrote:But see, even that reaction to the Harry Potter films would be selling each film short even though numerous different characters, subplots, dynamics, and elements of the HP mythos get explored in each film even if they are all the technically about the same thing. I don't really like Harry Potter films either, but having that reaction on my part would be dumb and not doing the films justice. Criticizing the Showa films numerous alien invasion plots because people who are lazy and don't want to bother paying attention to the films they're apparently forming an opinion on might find them repetitive is dumb.
And I've always found the criticism of Monster Zero that it's just the same as Ghidorah to be equally as dumb. They're drastically different films.
Gojira-Fan wrote:I would say it is less because of the plots that make some of the Alien Invasion movies bad, and more of the results of budget cuts. I would be able to tolerate movies like GODZILLA VS. GIGAN if it were more competently made.

Tohosaurus wrote:Gojira-Fan wrote:I would say it is less because of the plots that make some of the Alien Invasion movies bad, and more of the results of budget cuts. I would be able to tolerate movies like GODZILLA VS. GIGAN if it were more competently made.
There's probably something to that too, although I myself enjoy them all ... Gigan being the least of them, however.
Gojira-Fan wrote:Tohosaurus wrote:Gojira-Fan wrote:I would say it is less because of the plots that make some of the Alien Invasion movies bad, and more of the results of budget cuts. I would be able to tolerate movies like GODZILLA VS. GIGAN if it were more competently made.
There's probably something to that too, although I myself enjoy them all ... Gigan being the least of them, however.
I like most of them. I loved Astro-Monster. I haven't seen DAM in a long time. I liked Godzilla Vs. Mechagodzilla, although the climax I felt was kind of disappointing. And Terror of Mechagodzilla is my favorite Godzilla film.
But Gigan is like watching your favorite series swirl around in a toilet bowl and then flushed into a sewer.
And Megalon is the sewer.


Tyler wrote:I did find it a bit odd how the good guys trying to break out of the Black Hole base died in the explosion. The other characters don't seem to react to it that much.

Goji wrote:How is the climax of MECHAGODZILLA 74' even in the least bit disappointing?
Return to Showa Series (30's-70's)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests