The Jurassic Park/World Series

For the discussion of non-Toho monster media, tokusatsu franchises, and also for mixed discussion of Toho and non-Toho kaiju media.
Post Reply
JVM
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 5677
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:06 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by JVM »

Besides, its highly unlikely a T-rex would kill a Spino in a confrontation, since the sailback is nearly twice its size. After a few stray intimidating roars, wither party would back off.
I was about to call bullshit but then I saw the last sentence. That sounds about right really. If the two did fight, I really think it could go either way. The Spino has it's advantages and so does Rex. If you ask me, the real insult of the fight was how bloody short it was.
I used to be a lot more optimistic and outgoing, believe it or not. I used to actually be passionate about this stuff.

User avatar
Primevalgodzilla V2
Futurian
Posts: 3301
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:59 pm
Location: Church on the Hill

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Primevalgodzilla V2 »

so the spino won because he has a mohawk on his back?
What in my post implied that? :?

But technically you are right. The Spino is already friggin' huge. Its like nearly twice the T-rex's size and weight. The sail makes it look even bigger. So it looks titanic at this point. It wold probably scare off the T-rex even if its not really physically superior.

And even if came to blows, the T-rex isn't neccesarily going to just tear the Spino's head off. Don't forget how intimidating the Spino looks. It is much larger than the T-rex, and is, fish-eater or not, a predatory dinosaur. The T-rex isn't just gonna charge in to rip the Spino apart like it will to a hadrosaur. The rex is going to be more cautious. So it pretty much cmes down to who lands the first blow. The T-rex can inflict more devastating damage, but if the Spino lands a good strike with those spinosaur huge hooks, or its jaws for that matter, the T-rex ain't gonna stay. It will back off. A bite from the Spinosaur, while not particulary powerful, are still well capable of tearing into flesh, and having splintered teeth (the Spino's teeth are hollow, thus considerably weaker than normal fangs) in your wound is a sure-way for septicimia, a death sentence for most dinosaurs. So it really comes down to who lands the first blow.

So the JP3 movie wasn't all that innacurate. And it was a adolescent T-rex against what is supposed to be a full-grown Spino. Of course, you could go down to details and say how te Spino couldn't have tanked a Rex bite, but if you want to be so damn realistic, a dnosaur move founded upon unrealistic concepts shuldn't be what yu are watching.
If you ask me, the real insult of the fight was how bloody short it was.
The movie wasn't all about the fight. Its only natural it couldn't have been all that long. We know it was close for the most of it, and it was epic, if ou ask me. Besides, the real fight wouldn't be very long either.
It is a simple story. There is nothing that brings me happiness. Be it believing in others or them believe in me, it did not matter.
What others called happiness simply did not bring me joy.

Image

gwolf
Samurai
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by gwolf »

I am so going to regret this
Primevalgodzilla V2 wrote:
so the spino won because he has a mohawk on his back?
What in my post implied that? :?

But technically you are right. The Spino is already friggin' huge. Its like nearly twice the T-rex's size and weight. The sail makes it look even bigger. So it looks titanic at this point. It wold probably scare off the T-rex even if its not really physically superior.
No it's not. While some (insane) estimates have put the size of Spinosaurus at 20 tonnes, a much more logical weight estimate would be between 8 and 9 tonnes. There was an estimate of only 7 tonnes. The largest Tyrannosaurs we've found are around 8 tonnes, with the average being 7, 7.5. So while (probably) heavier, in the context of giant carnivores, it's not a huge difference. As for height, at most it's a foot or two taller, the real size difference is in the length of the body, and that's debatable. Some people put it at 60 feet long, some people put it at 40. Basically we just don't have the material to give a concrete estimate, bar the fact it is huge.
And even if came to blows, the T-rex isn't neccesarily going to just tear the Spino's head off. Don't forget how intimidating the Spino looks. It is much larger than the T-rex, and is, fish-eater or not, a predatory dinosaur. The T-rex isn't just gonna charge in to rip the Spino apart like it will to a hadrosaur. The rex is going to be more cautious. So it pretty much cmes down to who lands the first blow. The T-rex can inflict more devastating damage, but if the Spino lands a good strike with those spinosaur huge hooks, or its jaws for that matter, the T-rex ain't gonna stay. It will back off. A bite from the Spinosaur, while not particulary powerful, are still well capable of tearing into flesh, and having splintered teeth (the Spino's teeth are hollow, thus considerably weaker than normal fangs) in your wound is a sure-way for septicimia, a death sentence for most dinosaurs. So it really comes down to who lands the first blow.
Disregarding the intimidation factor of a sail...if indeed it was a sail and not a fat storage, physically you're looking at two very different animals. Spinosaurus is a highly specialised piscivore. It seems to have been designed in a similar fashion to its relatives (Baryonyx, Irritator, Suchomimus) which is where we get the assumption of large hooked claws. We don't actually have spinosaur hand material. But while these, along with the elongate teeth (I've never heard of them being hollow, and any spinosaur teeth I've seen seem relatively sturdy. Compressed and highly recurved, but not overly weak. In fact splintering teeth would be a poor evolution as it means you probably couldn't hold onto the small dinosaurs or wriggling fish you're hunting), would have allowed it to be an excellent fish hunter (kinda a grizzly on steroids), the animal shared its environment with Carcharadontosaurus, a big alpha carnivore. This suggests that the two were occupying different niches, and that Spinosaurus may not have been designed for hunting big prey. I would say what we know of the body does not suggest an animal that's tussling with animals approaching its size too often. It may have used its size in order to intimidate other carnivores off kills but that does not relate to anything bar big is scary. Tyrannosaurus on the other hand is ferociously overpowered for its size. It's extremely well muscled, it's retained the Ceolurosaur leg design, so it was probably relatively fast, binocular vision etc. All indicating an animal capable of tussling with others approaching its size. The jaw strength may have been in excess of 20 tonnes psi. A test done for a (granted iffy) show created a model which was capable of shearing a car in half. A single good bite from a Tyrannosaur would have a high percentage chance of crippling its prey, or killing in one blow. And it probably hunted animals larger than itself. We have Cretaceous sauropods, and many people have estimated the likes of Triceratops easily coming in at 10 tonnes. You've got two animals, both specialised but both doing different jobs. A few slashes and bites from a Spinosaurus, unless lucky, wouldn't kill a big theropod. A single bite from a rex may kill or cripple a ceratopsian or small sauropod. T. rex may have been slightly smaller, but pound for pound it was probably a tougher animal. That said, Spinosaurus would not be an easy kill, and simply throwing your weight around is a surprisingly effiecent strategy.

In the end I've always thought it was a ridiculous argument, more reflective of our habit of trying to monsterise dinosaurs than anything else. You don't seem to get online wars about lions vs tigers do you?
So the JP3 movie wasn't all that innacurate. And it was a adolescent T-rex against what is supposed to be a full-grown Spino. Of course, you could go down to details and say how te Spino couldn't have tanked a Rex bite, but if you want to be so damn realistic, a dnosaur move founded upon unrealistic concepts shuldn't be what yu are watching.
Actually, that's a fan theory. The robot is the same one used for the male rex in TLW. You can actually see its got the same facial scars. The reason people came up with the theory is because the Spinosaurus robot is a bit small. It's about 16 feet tall. They tried for 17 or 18 feet, but the robot turned out to be top heavy. So they needed to scale the rex down to 14 feet in official material to keep the spino bigger.
If you ask me, the real insult of the fight was how bloody short it was.
The movie wasn't all about the fight. Its only natural it couldn't have been all that long. We know it was close for the most of it, and it was epic, if ou ask me. Besides, the real fight wouldn't be very long either.
It was by far an away the best bit of the movie. And it was well played. But it was far too short. For one thing, realism is not what any JP is about, its a movie, you do what you have to for entertainment
.....can yall STOP overanalyzing the TREX vs SPINO fight? It was supposed to be a passing the torch to a new super predator.
Technically it was Horner projecting. Him and Gregory Paul could start up a club in that regards. Man's an aboslute genius, but he's been beating that dead horse for 20 years...

User avatar
Mini-Godzilla
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 993
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:55 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Mini-Godzilla »

Hellspawn28 wrote:When I first saw the movie in 2001 when it came out, I think it was okay. Not bad but not great neither.
When I saw it in theaters, the only thing that kept me from walking out was the person with me. Same problem I had with Alien vs. Predator and Terminator 3, actually. That's why I try to watch franchise sequels by myself now.

In short, I hated the film. And even when bananaoil convinced me to rewatch it earlier this year, I still hated it, despite my efforts to go easy on it. It's a theme park ride on celluloid, not a movie. The plot might have worked for the basic premise of a Land of the Lost-esque TV series, but it was far too thin for a Jurassic Park film.
Godzilla says I should learn to fight my own battles!

JVM
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 5677
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:06 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by JVM »

wataru wrote:....can yall STOP overanalyzing the TREX vs SPINO fight? It was supposed to be a passing the torch to a new super predator.
Oh relax, Wataru. If you were debating and I said that to you, you'd be pissed off.
The movie wasn't all about the fight. Its only natural it couldn't have been all that long. We know it was close for the most of it, and it was epic, if ou ask me. Besides, the real fight wouldn't be very long either.
Well of course, but there was a longer version seen in trailers, etc. It's just kind of stupid they cut it down to Rex biting Spino's neck and the same - two attacks that would both be fatal.
I used to be a lot more optimistic and outgoing, believe it or not. I used to actually be passionate about this stuff.

Xx_The_Masquerade_xX
Futurian
Posts: 3837
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Xx_The_Masquerade_xX »

Well since i searched far a wide, this was the first to come up...

With a supposed ''New Trilogy'' on the way...... Sam Neill who was in the first an third Jurassic park says do NOT expect a JP4 the franchise is dead....

Link - http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.p ... 89&count=0

While it isn't confirming or denying anything we didn't already know, If Universal want's a 4th film it will happen but it sucks to here the Dinosaur's are still dead. I'd like to hear it from Joe Johnston's mouth before i take this with any grain of salt... but i do miss having Dinosaur movies in theater.

User avatar
Zilla103192
Keizer
Posts: 8369
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:13 pm
Location: Monster Island
Contact:

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Zilla103192 »

Monster Master wrote:Frankly, I'm expecting a remake that's more along the lines of the book than a sequel within the next 5-10 years.
I would LOVE a more faithful adaption.
Don't try to be something else. Don't try to be less. Great things are going to happen in your life. Great things. And with that will come great responsibility.

My Official Facebook Page! Like and Share!! https://www.facebook.com/DillonFisherAr ... e=bookmark

User avatar
Ethan
G-Grasper
Posts: 1496
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:41 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Ethan »

"What's so great about discovery? It's a violent, penetrative act that scars what it observes. What you call discovery I call the rape of the natural world". Malcolm is easily the best character in the franchise. And then of course, there's this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg
"If only all garden variety fans had just one neck!"

User avatar
TokyoVigilante
Futurian
Posts: 3124
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:10 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by TokyoVigilante »

I'm tired of watching Tyler's ass with animatronics and actors from the nineteen-eighties.
“I have never listened to anyone who criticized my taste in space travel, sideshows or gorillas. When this occurs, I pack up my dinosaurs and leave the room.” - Ray Bradbury

User avatar
Crocodile
Gotengo Officer
Posts: 1868
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:32 pm
Location: The Sadida Kingdom

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Crocodile »

Tyler wrote:Remake my ass.
This should be a show on Bravo
Tik Tock, Tik Tock

Riders > Ponies

User avatar
TokyoVigilante
Futurian
Posts: 3124
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:10 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by TokyoVigilante »

It was the first decade that came to mind. The point is, we need to reboot your ass with for a new generation of ass lovers.
“I have never listened to anyone who criticized my taste in space travel, sideshows or gorillas. When this occurs, I pack up my dinosaurs and leave the room.” - Ray Bradbury

HayesAJones
Keizer
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:19 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by HayesAJones »

I think Tyler's ass is fine the way it is.

User avatar
Demon Lord Gira
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7257
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Asleep

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Demon Lord Gira »

The JP trilogy was whht got me into Dinosaurs in the first place. The first movie was revoluionary. No other movie up to that point in time had done what it had managed to do... Needless to say, i hold the series (Yes, even the third movie) in high regard.

As for what Gwolf said last page... I agree with all of what (S)he said. As I am also something of a mini-dino expect, all of what G-wolf said on the Spino and T-rex is true...
Come read my latest Fanfiction: Daily Life at the Cheshire Cafe

Image
GotengoXGodzilla wrote: It could be said that kaiju regeneration is like human dodging, basically.
GotengoXGodzilla wrote:That's not Mothra, that's an ugly goddamn demon!

Xx_The_Masquerade_xX
Futurian
Posts: 3837
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Xx_The_Masquerade_xX »

Steven Spielberg meets with screen writer to toss around idea's for a 4th ''Jurassic park''

- http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-s ... ob-119788/

Thank God! Just bring back Tyrannosaurus Rex as the main predator an im there...... Im glad theres some hope for this film.

User avatar
Biollante
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 926
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 12:04 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Biollante »

Bring back Jeff Goldblum.

User avatar
DrKaiju1954
G-Grasper
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:24 am

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by DrKaiju1954 »

I hope they give EVERY dinosaur some decent screen time.Just about every dinosaur in the series has a huge fan following and some have been let down(i.e. Dilophosaurus,Triceratops,Spinosaurus(thats my opinion),and if they do have a dinosaur fight,at least let it be satisfying to most people because there will be people who don't like it no matter what so don't go trying to make one group happy.Thats my two cents.
"You're trespassing in my reality. Ask permission next time."

User avatar
Biollante
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 926
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 12:04 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by Biollante »

I wonder if they plan on using the established JP dinosaurs or take the accurate route and fill them with feathers.

User avatar
DrKaiju1954
G-Grasper
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:24 am

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by DrKaiju1954 »

Biollante wrote:I wonder if they plan on using the established JP dinosaurs or take the accurate route and fill them with feathers.
I've grown up with raptors and other dinosaurs the way they were back then and I honestly wouldn't have it any other way .
"You're trespassing in my reality. Ask permission next time."

HayesAJones
Keizer
Posts: 9201
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:19 pm

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by HayesAJones »

Personally, I think a fully-feathered raptor would be badass. Giving it a little mane or crest that spikes up right before it attacks. And I wish they were correctly sized too, no more big-as-a-man stuff. Small dromaeosaurs can be just as dangerous.

User avatar
DrKaiju1954
G-Grasper
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:24 am

Re: The Jurassic Park Trilogy

Post by DrKaiju1954 »

Wouldn't it be wierd to see raptors change so dramatically from one movie to another?A lot of fans would be confused by that.
"You're trespassing in my reality. Ask permission next time."

Post Reply