Reductio ad Absurdum arguments banned?

[TetsukiGroudon]

I find it funny how Jomie got banned for misbehaving, yet we got plenty of new members who tend to almost purely shitpost, who were worse than he ever was. Sure, one got banned, but that was only because he was an apparent dupe.

[Castellan Zilla]

Yea, there's some spammy posts in his post history, but also legitimate on-topic posts too. There's nothing in there to warrant a perma-ban.

[3000]

Yea, there's some spammy posts in his post history, but also legitimate on-topic posts too. There's nothing in there to warrant a perma-ban.

I agree.

Off topic posts shouldnt neccessarily warrant a ban, especially when many members go on page long topic derailing spam wank offs, seemingly without any punishment, definitely havent seen any bannings. All im asking for is consistency cause i'm not seeing anything in Jomei's recent post history that warrants a ban.

[Godzilla The King]

Though his attitude couldn't have helped, no matter how right it was, not saying it was right but I could see how it happened.

[miguelnuva]

So Jomei is gone for simply speaking his mind. Sounds like BS to me. If he just got back from a 3 warnings/ week ban how did he get the 4 more warnings to get permanent banned.

[Godzilla The King]

He should've gotten a temp-ban, dunno if he deserved the boot for good. You can disagree with him ( like me) but booting him right away was not the answer. His attitude wasn't the best, sure, but you can't just throw away the rules.

I believe you gotta be fair, and if this was fair, everyone's fair game.

[miguelnuva]

I want to know what he did to go from 3 warnings to the 7 to get banned.

[Superrex]

I want to know what he did to go from 3 warnings to the 7 to get banned.

I don't think he even got 7. I'm pretty sure a certain someone just didn't like him.

[SpaceG92]

#1: Don't reply to a troll
#2: DO NOT, THROW INSULTS. 1, it feeds them. 2, it gets YOU in trouble. You know better.