Page 1 of 274

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:27 pm
by Legionmaster
I use BL/UU Pokemon whenever I can. Go Azumarill!

And yeah, I have legit versions of all 493 Pokemon in Platinum.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:14 pm
by vaporchu
I wish Stealth Rock was nerfed so that it doesn't do super effective damage. Also, I guess have it not do not very effective damage as well. I want to see Charizard rise through the ranks again.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:39 pm
by Demon Lord Gira
Stealth Rocks... you either love them or hate them... These days, it's foolish to enter a competitive battle without a Stealth Rocker on your team. Many pokemon that would be Ou (Charizard) are bumped down to NU because of it. At the same time, however, it prevents monsters like Dragonite and Gyarados from setting up a DD, switching out, then setting it back up again as much as they like without risking loosing their mon... Personaly, I think that Stealth Rocks is a good idea, and I think Gamefreak might just actually make mroe Steath Rock-ish moves, like Stealth Ice (Boy, will THAT be alot of fun for Salamance and Garchomp in Ubers...)

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:05 am
by Hellblaze
Hotrod93 wrote:
Godzilla 2000 wrote:It wouldnt be so bad if SR was like Spikes, in the sense that only certain pokemon could learn it. Too many pokemon can learn it.
Again I have to agree, also Id like to see GF fix Mold Breaker.


EDIT:

This is 100% Fake just so people will know, Thier pretty good though.
Image
Who knows that could be real but we'll find out when Coro Coro and Pokemon Sunday announce more new Pokemon! :D

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:53 am
by Hotrod93
Hellblaze wrote:
Hotrod93 wrote:
Godzilla 2000 wrote:It wouldnt be so bad if SR was like Spikes, in the sense that only certain pokemon could learn it. Too many pokemon can learn it.
Again I have to agree, also Id like to see GF fix Mold Breaker.


EDIT:

This is 100% Fake just so people will know, Thier pretty good though.
Image
Who knows that could be real but we'll find out when Coro Coro and Pokemon Sunday announce more new Pokemon! :D
Its fake, some dude on 2ch sent this to Joe "Serebii", only later to find out the scan is fake.

Plus its still alittle early for Corocoro Scans for this month to be out, give it a week.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:35 am
by vaporchu
Man, too bad they are fake. I'd train that Japanese-looking one.

Who ever faked these must be a god at mimicking Sugimori's art style though. I mean god damn that is profesional looking.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:01 am
by Gorosaurus Rex
I'm really hoping we get some cool Fossils this generation. They are always the highlight of the game for me.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:53 am
by Legionmaster
Gorosaurus Rex wrote:I'm really hoping we get some cool Fossils this generation. They are always the highlight of the game for me.
Indeed. Bastiodon and Rampardos are letdown central.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:08 am
by vaporchu
Rampardos had the ability to be cool...but he went and had to have bad stats. A glass cannon that is slow?

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:25 am
by Legionmaster
But he's ugly as shit. All the other fossil Pokemon are cool, except the 2 recent ones.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:19 pm
by Legionmaster
Stuckey wrote:He's just a little derpy looking. That's all.
Kabutops and Cradily are some of the best Pokemon though. Not sure why they aren't OU. Hell, I use Kabutops in Ubers and he rapes.
Kabutops does see use in OU. And Ubers. And UU. And I've had success with Cradily in OU. Both are awesome. Armaldo is pretty sweet too. Omastar is still cool. Aerodactyl is coolish. Stupid DP fossils? Lameeeeesauce.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:07 pm
by Zillas
Legionmaster wrote:Stupid DP fossils? Lameeeeesauce.
What's this now? I seem to do pretty well with my Bastiodon...

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:17 am
by vaporchu
Zillas wrote:
Legionmaster wrote:Stupid DP fossils? Lameeeeesauce.
What's this now? I seem to do pretty well with my Bastiodon...
I LOVE BASTIODON!

Am I the only one that kinda finds Omastar to be a little worthless? I much prefer the other fossils to it.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:29 am
by Hotrod93

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:47 am
by Legionmaster
vaporchu wrote:Am I the only one that kinda finds Omastar to be a little worthless? I much prefer the other fossils to it.
The water Pokemon with the highest special attack outside of Ubers is a nifty title to have. Combined with Swift Swim, Omastar can turn into a crushing sweeper, or use its defenses for support, but it sweeps better.

And I'm hoping that new deer is a Stantler prevo. And that Stantler will also get an evo that is a moose.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:03 pm
by vaporchu
Sorry, but I like my fossils to be a little less...awkward. It may be great for battling, but I honestly do not see any appeal in its design.

Anyways, the new trailer = Holy Shit. Were the routes actually changing seasons or were they apart of the version differences? Either way, these games are beautiful. I thought the Bell Chime Path in HG/SS was stunning...it seems like they are going to take that and make it the entire game.

The cutscenes look great. The 3D on the DS is kinda meh, but they seem to be making great use of it.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:08 pm
by Legionmaster
ZOMG. Pokemon. Now. Has. Black people.

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:45 pm
by vaporchu
Legionmaster wrote:ZOMG. Pokemon. Now. Has. Black people.
A gym leader and some Football players!

That kid in the trailer was just so funny looking I had to put him as my avatar. Crap quality, but all I can find is that youtube video. Kinda sad, cause Filb.de usually has a high quality video up...

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:08 pm
by vaporchu
As if Wargle didn't make it obvious enough already. Plus the Chinchilla's name is apparently Chilarmy when romanized.

God I can't think of the Football players without thinking of Super Mario World. I swear if they name one of them Chuck I'm gonna have a good laugh.

EDIT: Er, anyone here know if there's an R/S/E soundfont? The only way I could think of making a song using those instruments would be to actually hack the song into the game itself....which I'd rather not have to. I just want to see what some of the newer songs sound like with the R/S/E instruments.

(Also, this Lance Remix is pretty kickass. Makes me want to play Liquid Crystal.)

Re: Pokemon Game Discussion 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:22 pm
by Bret
I hope they bring back the Surfing Pikachu minigame at some point. That one was awesome.