The Hunger Games (2012)

For the discussion of movies and TV shows not distributed by Toho.

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gorosaurus Rex » Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:29 am

I've honestly never heard much of Battle Royale either, and I doubt much of The Hunger Games's audience has heard of it either. I can let the author get away with this one.

As for the book/film, I read the book for the first time around Christmas last year after seemingly my entire group of friends and my mother read through them in like the course of a week. It was entertaining and decently written and for a young adult novel about teenagers murdering one another it actually was pretty good.

The film, like many who attempt to follow a book's plot rather closely, struggles with some of the minor details and exposition and because of that a few relationships feel more hollow than they should, however, they nail the dystopia aspect. The set design and costume design do a brilliant job at conveying the messed up world the series takes place in. I also thought the score and cinematography were pretty good too. Jennifer Lawrence pretty much kicked ass as well. I'd recommend it.
SuperSaiyan4Godzilla wrote:And Godzilla isn't Pixar. The latter deals with children. The former deals with adults who behave like children.
User avatar
Gorosaurus Rex
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:53 pm
Location: The Savage Land

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby bananaoil » Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:12 am

Svitska Donkun wrote:
Uhm...no. No its not. Not at all. Two plots being the same is a lot different than accusing James Cameron of plagiarism by naming his planet "Pandora", like Borderlands did, or your other examples.

Have you actually compared the two source materials? They are REMARKABLY similar, to the point where Koushun Takami was advised to sue for plagiarism/royalties. He never did, but still. The similarities are excruciatingly obvious.


I'm exaggerating quite a bit. But these fan boy knee-jerk cries of plagiarism are a bit much. Thankfully, plot threads aren't the only elements of a story.
Daikaiju is better with rainbows!!!
bananaoil
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gawdziller » Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:03 am

She may have, may not have heard of Battle Royale. What counts in the end is storytelling.

I've just started reading the Hunger Games. So far the damn thing is a chore. Battle Royale, on the other hand, gripped me from its early pages on with its characters. But this...words cannot describe just how little I care.
Legion1979 wrote:Oh yes, thank you for linking to a page with nothing but Japanese text. That was so damn helpful.

Brody wrote:I don't approve of any kind of sex that involves male genitalia
User avatar
Gawdziller
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:35 am
Location: Emmett, Idaho

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Hellspawn28 » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:39 am

The reviews for the movie have been saying that the movie is pretty good. I'm not sure if I should I see it or not since I never read the book and my inner film snob inside me is telling me that I'm better off sticking with The Running Man. It seem like Stephen King did everything better nearly 25 years ago.
Last edited by Hellspawn28 on Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hellspawn28
Seatopian Demigod
 
Posts: 16885
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Proofpoochie » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:53 pm

Battle Royale> The Hunger Games. It's funny how the much better film got an official American release on Tuesday.
Xbox Live Gamertag: Proofpoochie
User avatar
Proofpoochie
JXSDF Technician
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:00 am

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby HikizuruBeat » Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:35 pm

I want to go see the hunger games out of curiosity. I enjoyed the Battle Royale movie even though the novel is better.
I still want to read the battle royale novel and maybe hunger games too.
TK's resident resident

Crocodile wrote:
Jomei wrote: I lost my virginity at the age of 6 to every single member of the Spice Girls.


Why am I willing to believe this?
User avatar
HikizuruBeat
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:56 pm
Location: Under your bed

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gawdziller » Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:53 pm

HikizuruBeat wrote:I want to go see the hunger games out of curiosity. I enjoyed the Battle Royale movie even though the novel is better.
I still want to read the battle royale novel and maybe hunger games too.



Seek out Battle Royale. It's quite possibly the fastest 600 pages I've ever read.

The Hunger Games though, ugh. I can't bring myself to continue.
Legion1979 wrote:Oh yes, thank you for linking to a page with nothing but Japanese text. That was so damn helpful.

Brody wrote:I don't approve of any kind of sex that involves male genitalia
User avatar
Gawdziller
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:35 am
Location: Emmett, Idaho

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Godzilla 1995 » Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:10 pm

Saw the film last night. Twas excellent, but took until the games begun for the movie to finally live up to the hype. Still, definitely worth the money.
Defend the Union!

Gorosaurus Rex wrote:We've officially reached the state of examining blurry images for clues. I'll go get the Cloverfield monster and Bigfoot over here. They could really help with this.
User avatar
Godzilla 1995
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:31 am
Location: Elite Ranger Corps barracks, Rimmenon.

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Hellspawn28 » Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:52 pm

Proofpoochie wrote:Battle Royale> The Hunger Games. It's funny how the much better film got an official American release on Tuesday.


What about The Running Man (1987)? It seems like The Hunger Games has a similar to plot to it? I'm sure The Hunger Games will be better then Gamer (Another movie from a couple years ago with a similar plot), but the movie still looks dull to me.
User avatar
Hellspawn28
Seatopian Demigod
 
Posts: 16885
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Proofpoochie » Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:48 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:
Proofpoochie wrote:Battle Royale> The Hunger Games. It's funny how the much better film got an official American release on Tuesday.


What about The Running Man (1987)? It seems like The Hunger Games has a similar to plot to it? I'm sure The Hunger Games will be better then Gamer (Another movie from a couple years ago with a similar plot), but the movie still looks dull to me.


I was just saying Battle Royale is a superior film with a similar plot.
Last edited by Proofpoochie on Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Xbox Live Gamertag: Proofpoochie
User avatar
Proofpoochie
JXSDF Technician
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:00 am

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gawdziller » Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:00 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:
Proofpoochie wrote:Battle Royale> The Hunger Games. It's funny how the much better film got an official American release on Tuesday.


What about The Running Man (1987)? It seems like The Hunger Games has a similar to plot to it? I'm sure The Hunger Games will be better then Gamer (Another movie from a couple years ago with a similar plot), but the movie still looks dull to me.



Taking the books into consideration, the novel of the Running Man is too different to compare. The main character isn't competing in a gladiator type game, but is trying to stay on the run across the country for a certain amount of time (I want to say a month, but I haven't read it since High School). It's more like the Fugitive than anything else. I don't remember a lot of it, but it was interesting, if unspectacular.

As far as books go, Battle Royale wins.

On movies, haven't seen the Hunger Games and have very little desire to. Battle Royale made the mistake of condensing 600 pages and trying to keep pace with it. The Running Man created a new plot entirely. I like them both for different reasons, but the Running Man's cheese value always makes me grin, though as an adaptation, Battle Royale was more faithful to the source material.
Legion1979 wrote:Oh yes, thank you for linking to a page with nothing but Japanese text. That was so damn helpful.

Brody wrote:I don't approve of any kind of sex that involves male genitalia
User avatar
Gawdziller
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:35 am
Location: Emmett, Idaho

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby daftfalloutgoji » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:04 pm

I did not like the book and I will not see the movie. Stupid idiotic director is wasting our valuable time with its stupid movies.
Gawdziller wrote:Cloverfield sucks buttcheek.

That's my uppity contribution.

NSZ wrote:
I'm starting to think Arnold Johnson was just some random raving lunatic that often stood out in front of museums and got mistaken for a scientist.
User avatar
daftfalloutgoji
JXSDF Technician
 
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:35 pm
Location: Kino Der Toten

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gorosaurus Rex » Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:50 am

daftfalloutgoji wrote:I did not like the book and I will not see the movie. Stupid idiotic director is wasting our valuable time with its stupid movies.


If you aren't going to see the movie, how exactly is it wasting your time?
SuperSaiyan4Godzilla wrote:And Godzilla isn't Pixar. The latter deals with children. The former deals with adults who behave like children.
User avatar
Gorosaurus Rex
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:53 pm
Location: The Savage Land

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby spinzilla » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:31 am

I thought the movie was alright, not really my thing though. I found it slow at times and I did dose off at one point (but that may have been just as much my fault though, as I slept very little due to a presentation). Some of the art was really bad at times. I mean, it's really weird when Lenny Kravtiz is the most normal looking person in the city.
If you don't like MMA your man card belongs in a purse.
User avatar
spinzilla
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:31 am

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Gojisan866 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:29 pm

Being a huge fan of the books, I was pretty excited to see this. I really didn't have much problem with it 'cept that the dogs at the end were really cheesy, the eyes looked really cartoony. I also thought it was too short. But what're you gonna do? Just gotta wait a few years 'til Catching Fire is released.
Im Land Der Raketen-Würmer - The German title for TREMORS translates to IN THE LAND OF THE ROCKETWORMS.
User avatar
Gojisan866
Interpol Agent
 
Posts: 716
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:31 pm
Location: 20,000 fathoms under the sea.

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Rody » Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:34 pm

^ I believe it's slated to be released next year.
Varan Bon Ziller wrote:I like sundaes, but I'd be pretty *@!##)* if Godzilla was made into a giant tub of ice cream.
User avatar
Rody
EDF Soldier
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:55 am

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby omgitsgodzilla » Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:05 pm

At least this one won't be another like Stormbreaker or Eragon where the first one sucks, tanks and the rest don't get released.
Marxist, Troper, filmmaker, drummer and rapper.

TheChingzilla wrote:King Ghidorah and Manda, they would make sweet love with their snake like structures

edgaguirus wrote:Talk about necking.


KEEP CIRCULATING THE TAPES
User avatar
omgitsgodzilla
G-Force Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2991
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:52 am
Location: Illinois

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Hellspawn28 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:20 pm

I just saw this with my family and it's a okay movie. I don't think it's a bad movie but I feel like it could have been better. The movie had no character development seeing that we hardly know any of these characters. I didn't feel for them at all, not even for the rich people in the movie since I was told that they look stupid because you are supposed to hate them. Also, does this movie take place in the future or another Planet because they explain how this whole thing started in the first place? The CG was not very good neither since those Dog's look awful and the CG shots of the city look very fake looking.

Overall I give the movie at least a 6.5/10, I did like the action scenes in the movie though.
User avatar
Hellspawn28
Seatopian Demigod
 
Posts: 16885
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Mothra Freak » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:49 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:I just saw this with my family and it's a okay movie. I don't think it's a bad movie but I feel like it could have been better. The movie had no character development seeing that we hardly know any of these characters. I didn't feel for them at all, not even for the rich people in the movie since I was told that they look stupid because you are supposed to hate them. Also, does this movie take place in the future or another Planet because they explain how this whole thing started in the first place? The CG was not very good neither since those Dog's look awful and the CG shots of the city look very fake looking.

Overall I give the movie at least a 6.5/10, I did like the action scenes in the movie though.

You probably would've liked it better if you'd read the book. The movie was overall a good adaptation, but they were forced to cut out some rather important plot details and character-defining moments because of time constraints.

It takes place in a future version of North America, after a series of natural disasters killed off much of humanity. The Capitol is located in the Rockies, and District 12 is in the Appalachians.

Speaking of which, I did enjoy the movie. I thought the actors did a good job with the material they were given, though, as I said, they could've been given more to work with. The movie could've used Katniss's narration, too. That would've helped a lot, in my opinion. Didn't care for the camerawork. Other than that, though, it was pretty good.
Tyler wrote:
GojiFan wrote:standard robots with a hatred for the living.


So they're hipsters.


TK's resident resident.
User avatar
Mothra Freak
Futurian
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:09 am

Re: The Hunger Games (2012)

Postby Hellspawn28 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:57 pm

I never read the book, but I think a movie based on a book should enjoyable for both fans and non-fans. I feel like that's the whole point on doing a movie that is made for a wider audience. I remember I saw Lord of the Ring's before I read the book and at least I care for the characters and understand what was going on.
User avatar
Hellspawn28
Seatopian Demigod
 
Posts: 16885
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:06 pm
Location: Maryland

PreviousNext

Return to Media Center

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests