UltramanGoji wrote:
Nevermind. It was supposed to mean that I sent SG your post in a PM.
Gee, thanks.

Now that horse will be beat to a even bloodier pulp.
wataru wrote:
How about killing Bishop, Newt & Hicks?
Worst thing about ALIEN 3, by far. Though I fail to see how this is (even indirectly) "spitting in Cameron's face". Maybe this is simply a case of you needing to be a little less hyperbolic in your responses..or is that too much to ask from you?
I mentioned Burke, not Ripley as more memorable then anyone in Alien3. Funny how one film (ALIENS) can produce more memorable characters then another (Alien3)? With someone like Whittaker, Im very shocked. Even Cameron's fodder was more interesting. I cared more about Drake then I did about ANY inmate.
I don't think you were really supposed to "care" about any of them anyway.
Again, of course Burke is more memorable. He's one of the
main characters. How many times do I have to skreeonk repeat myself here?
The only films Ive ever watched based on director are Tarantino's films.
Okay..and? You're still comparing an American classic to a film that has a small following, and is generally disliked by critics and most fans.
Not fair? Im sorry, theyre part of the same franchise.
Nawwwww, really? I
just said that.
ALIEN 3 is nothing like ALIEN or ALIENS. They all feature Ripley, they're all part of the same story, and all feature xenomorph's. The similarities really end there. They're all unique in their own way.
I suppose it's fair to compare tripe like SPACEGODZILLA to GODZILLA ('54) because they're "part of the same franchise?" They're
nothing alike.
f you read my previous post, I DID mention it.
No shit. This isn't a case of selective reading. I'm pointing out your ridiculous complaint about "brainless gore" being a detriment to ALIEN 3 exclusively. RESURRECTION and AVP:R both feature the same 'problem'. You're just finding things to complain about because you (evidently) hate the film so passionately.