Official The Amazing Spider Man Thread

[Hellspawn28]

David Fincher (Alien 3, Fight Club, and Social Network) talks about the reboot movie.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ ... s/?a=21681

David almost direct the first SM movie after James Cameron left when the movie had a 1994 or 1995 release date. I remember reading that his movie had Spider-Man dieing at the end of the movie.

[DaikaijuSokogeki!]

So Fincher can't accept a guy who shoots webs from his hands, but he can accept a guy who ages backwards?

[zilla103192]

well DUH!!! i mean a man with spider powers? that cant ever happen...

but an old man that turns into a baby... i see that every day!!









sarcasm of course...

[Hellspawn28]

I'm gald he did not direct Spider-Man since the idea of Spider-Man getting killed at the end of the movie sounds awful.

[Spirit Ghidorah 2010]

So Fincher can't accept a guy who shoots webs from his hands, but he can accept a guy who ages backwards?

And apparently he can accept a Xeno egg magically appearing on a ship even though the Queen died before it laid any eggs.

[Tyler]

And apparently he can accept a Xeno egg magically appearing on a ship even though the Queen died before it laid any eggs.

True, but you can't blame him entirely for Alien 3 turning out the way it did. Fox mucked a lot of stuff up.

[mecha-gino]

I'm gald he did not direct Spider-Man since the idea of Spider-Man getting killed at the end of the movie sounds awful.

Well don't shit on that idea unless you read the script first and I myself wouldn't mind that as long as it's a stand alone film.

[Gorosaurus Rex]

I'm all for a risky Spider-man film. However, I do not want to see an overly dark approach to the character. Maturity is fine, but Spider-man is not Batman. Do not try and copy The Dark Knight.

[Hellspawn28]

What title do you think the title for the movie will be? I hope it's something simple like "The Amazing Spider-Man" or "The Spectacular Spider-Man". I do have a feeling that they might call it "Ultimate Spider-Man" though.

[mecha-gino]

F*CK calling it Ultimate Spider-man!

Just call it the amazing spider-man and their you go.

[zilla103192]

id be happy with simply Spider-man

[Hellspawn28]

But calling it "Spider-Man" will confuse people thinking it's a remake, and people will be like "The first movie cameout 10 years ago, why are they remaking a movie that cameout 10 years ago?".

[G1 Startruck Jonez]

I'm still wondering why they're rebooting a franchise thats 10 years old.

[Hellspawn28]

I'm still wondering why they're rebooting a franchise thats 10 years old.

You can say the samething about Batman .

[G1 Startruck Jonez]

I'm still wondering why they're rebooting a franchise thats 10 years old.

You can say the samething about Batman .

Ah, but Batman needed that. That franchise was ground into the dirt. Spiderman 3 was a dissapointment, but it wasnt a franchise killer.
Thats the difference.

[gvamp]

I don't care what they call it I just want to know who the villian is and I'd prefer that villian be The Lizard.

[Hellspawn28]

I'm pretty sure Lizard is the official villain.

[Gorosaurus Rex]

I'm pretty sure Lizard is the official villain.

Wasn't he one of the things that Sony wouldn't let Raimi do with Spider-man 4 in the first place?

[Hellspawn28]

But Raimi has nothing to do with this movie, and Lizard is one of Spider-Man's most popular foes. And not to mention that Sony wants a new start for the series.

[Gorosaurus Rex]

But Raimi has nothing to do with this movie, and Lizard is one of Spider-Man's most popular foes. And not to mention that Sony wants a new start for the series.

Sony still is. They are the ones that had issues with the Lizard being a part of this film.