Legion1979 wrote:Oh yes, thank you for linking to a page with nothing but Japanese text. That was so damn helpful.
Brody wrote:I don't approve of any kind of sex that involves male genitalia

Gawdziller wrote:The people of the previous generation would say the same of the ones we watched in our youth. It's an endless chain. The youth of this generation will say the same of the next and so on and so forth.

Dust_pan wrote:Well, at least you mentioned those good ol' gems.
I have a hard time saying that cartoons these days suck. I truly dislike a number of them because of their mediocre writing (God DAM is it obnoxious.), animation, and artwork, but I have this gut feeling that maybe I'm just being nostalgic and biased towards the cartoons I've grown up with.
I feel that characters on shows like Hey Arnold, Cat Dog, Looney Tunes, and many other pre-2000 Cartoon Network/Nick/Toon Disney shows had a lot of personality and were generally fun to watch. But then I see my little cousins watching their stupid modern day cartoons, and they enjoy them just as much as I enjoyed my own stuff when I was little. So perhaps they just understand their shows better and see them as works of art. Or they're just lazy kids who'll watch whatever's on the tube.
JAGzilla wrote:There are plenty of good modern cartoons, too. And there were a lot of terrible ones whenever you were a kid. No animation era is universally one way or the other. In any case, it's all subjective. "One man's trash..." or whatever.

Dust_pan wrote:
Destroyer already mentioned a number of the good toons these days.
JAGzilla wrote:There are plenty of good modern cartoons, too. And there were a lot of terrible ones whenever you were a kid. No animation era is universally one way or the other. In any case, it's all subjective. "One man's trash..." or whatever.
GotengoXGodzilla wrote: It could be said that kaiju regeneration is like human dodging, basically.
GotengoXGodzilla wrote:That's not Mothra, that's an ugly goddamn demon!

JAGzilla wrote:Ah. I didn't read the editorial yet, so i hadn't seen that.
Hellspawn28 wrote:I think there was bad shows pre-2000 but I noticed that a lot of older shows are better critically speaking. Compare a older show like Batman: TAS and compare it to the newer shows like The Batman from 2005 or 2006 then you see the older show is better. Some newer cartoons are better older ones though like new Avengers
cartoon is million times better then the awful Avengers cartoon from the late 90's.
Hellspawn28 wrote:I remember the 90's show was really bad and that the Avengers like Thor or Captain America were hardly in the show. I was born in 1991, so I pretty much caring for most shows on TV when I started High School. I didn't care for Adventure Time or Total Drama Island but I can see why people would like them.


Gojira-Fan wrote:I think your just being nostalgic.
There are some good modern cartoons out there.
You're not even these shows target demographic, so does it even matter if shows directed at children don't appeal to you? Like, what if some teenager in the early 2000's said that cartoons then sucked and liked early 90's cartoons better?
And I think cartoons are actually doing a good job getting older kids interested. Look at the viewership for Adventure Time or Regular Show. Lot's of older viewers there.
Users browsing this forum: BrashAlaskan95, kongconan, Legionmaster, NSZ, RedZillaKing and 8 guests