Living Corpse wrote:Not a popular movie I know, but Batman vs Superman did the impossible for me. It actually made me relate to Superman and how he is a misunderstood guy who is trying to do the right thing. And after years of hearing how "scary" Batman is supposed to be, it actually made me scared of Batman.
Superman just being a genuinely well-intentioned person, despite (or even because of) his great power is actually hugely appealing. That, and he's a populist/journalist superhero, which is great.
The problem is it's easy to make that feel dated and authoritarian, especially if no one is bold enough to write beyond the notion that what's good is what is status quo. Superman at his best is my favorite superhero and an absolute pleasure to spend time with. There are a good four or five decades of Superman material I couldn't care less about, though, and unfortunately its those presentations -- authoritarian, out of touch -- that DC has continuously decided to put forth as the face of the character. The nadir for me is John Byrne's characterization that kicked off the late '80s reboot of the comics, along with multiple 2000s entries in the worst genre of all time: stories about why Superman is or is not still relevant (see the abominable "What's So Funny About Truth, Justice, and the American Way?"). What a shitty and reductive starting place when writing any character. But it's where you put yourself when you spend decades associating the character with the conservative safeness of Boyscout-esque morality. Being a genuinely good person does not have to mean being a boring or unquestioning one.
Or -- and I'm about to anger some people, I'm sure -- Superman's trajectory as a fictional figure oddly mirrors Jesus' as a historical one. (I'm sorry! I'm not religious, but I find this a weirdly apt comparison among two recognized iconic figures.) Both begin as morally conscious populist figures, but at some point become so celebrated they became icons of the status quo, far removed from their original purposes and ideologies. It's a shame, because Golden Age Superman, along with later incarnations inspired by that take, and Jesus per his actual philosophies, are both pretty rad dudes.
There really were bits and pieces of a decent Superman scattered throughout at least
Man of Steel (I still haven't seen
BvS): the dedication to helping others, some flippant qualities when something's standing in his way (the little beat with the military at the end was great), etc., but they're wrapped up in such an implausibly dour film and crappy script that none of it mattered. Plus, you know, destruction and murder, which is probably not the best way to kick off the character.