The Paleontology Thread

For the discussion of topics not already covered by the other categories.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

Tyrant_Lizard_King wrote:What the hell are you talking about?
IIRC, Richard Lydekker named a large ichthyosaur vertebrae Ichthyosaurus Hectorii in honor of James Hector,a geologist. Now, of course, almost all the species put into Ichthyosaurus are now considered distinct. Of course, the same would be the case for this ichthyosaur if the ship transporting it hadn't sunk on it's way to America. IIRC, the vertebrae was 48CM in diameter, which is over double that of the next largest ichthyosaur, the 75 foot Shastasaurus.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

User avatar
Tyrant_Lizard_King
Sazer
Posts: 12884
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:57 am
Location: The Planet Trade HQ
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Tyrant_Lizard_King »

Never heard of that. Cool!
Rocker, paleo buff, cryptid enthusiast, Dragonball fanatic, and lover of comic book, video game, manga, & anime babes!
Follow me on Twitter, if you dare! https://twitter.com/TLK_1983
Image

User avatar
master_of_monsters
EDF Instructor
Posts: 2006
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:57 am

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by master_of_monsters »

fossil record, be a bro and show me some new spinosaurus fossils
your source of self destruction

User avatar
BARAGONZILLA
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1164
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:57 pm
Location: Some where, in a vast land.

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by BARAGONZILLA »

master_of_monsters wrote:fossil record, be a bro and show me some new spinosaurus fossils
That and another carnotaurus.
I have always found it interesting that there are dinosaurs we have only found one specimen of, yet we know so much about them. And then there are others where we have several specimens, and yet don’t know as much.

Speaking of Carnotaurus, I was wondering if anyone here could help me. I am trying to put together a 6-8 minute film about a carnotaurus but there is a key thing I am missing.
I would like to include a chase sequence but I am not entirely sure what dinosaur a carnotaurus would eat. Like what would be a good dinosaur to add into the film, for a carnotaurus to hunt, and would be considered somewhat accurate?
Last edited by BARAGONZILLA on Thu May 03, 2018 1:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
This is the beginning of the end.

User avatar
RamshackleRanger
Futurian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by RamshackleRanger »

BARAGONZILLA wrote: I would like to include a chase sequence but I am not entirely sure what dinosaur a carnotaurus would eat. Like what would be a good dinosaur to add into the film, for a carnotaurus to hunt, and would be considered somewhat accurate?
Sadly, we don't know many dinosaurs from the same formation as Carnotaurus - what we do know, however, is that it was built for bursts of highspeeds in open environments. it couldn't turn that sharply, so smaller prey like dryosaurus will be unlikely for a chase scene - i'd say a smaller hadrosaur or ornithopod like tenontosaurus would be a great prey item, though not necessarily accurate. (there is an indeterminate hadrosaurid from la colonia, so you could always just make a fictional or very general one).
Last edited by RamshackleRanger on Thu May 03, 2018 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

BARAGONZILLA wrote:
master_of_monsters wrote:fossil record, be a bro and show me some new spinosaurus fossils
That and another carnotaurus.
I have always found it interesting that there are dinosaurs we have only found one specimen of, yet we know so much about them. And then there are others where we have several specimens, and yet don’t know as much.

Speaking of Carnotaurus, I was wondering if anyone here could help me. I am trying to put together a 6-8 minute film about a carnotaurus but there is a key thing I am missing.
I would like to include a chase sequence but I am not entirely sure what dinosaur a carnotaurus would eat. Like what would be a good dinosaur to add into the film, for a carnotaurus to hunt, and would be considered somewhat accurate?
Young sauropod or ankylosaur would be probable. Carnotaurus was a mid-tier hunter and scavenger, so i'd say if you want an adult dino then mabye an ornithopod like iguanodon.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

User avatar
MoarCrossovers
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 7320
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:54 am
Location: guess

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by MoarCrossovers »

BARAGONZILLA wrote:
master_of_monsters wrote:fossil record, be a bro and show me some new spinosaurus fossils
That and another carnotaurus.
I have always found it interesting that there are dinosaurs we have only found one specimen of, yet we know so much about them. And then there are others where we have several specimens, and yet don’t know as much.

Speaking of Carnotaurus, I was wondering if anyone here could help me. I am trying to put together a 6-8 minute film about a carnotaurus but there is a key thing I am missing.
I would like to include a chase sequence but I am not entirely sure what dinosaur a carnotaurus would eat. Like what would be a good dinosaur to add into the film, for a carnotaurus to hunt, and would be considered somewhat accurate?
Antarctopelta and Saltasaurus would be good candidates.
Platypus Prime wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 1:21 pm I realized today that thanks to a few animations and manga she's appeared in, Biollante is an anime girl.
Image

Xx_The_Masquerade_xX
Futurian
Posts: 3837
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:13 pm

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Xx_The_Masquerade_xX »

Article - T-Rex was smarter then previously thought

link - https://www.thedailybeast.com/t-rex-was ... ref=scroll

User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

Birdman wrote:
BARAGONZILLA wrote:
master_of_monsters wrote:fossil record, be a bro and show me some new spinosaurus fossils
That and another carnotaurus.
I have always found it interesting that there are dinosaurs we have only found one specimen of, yet we know so much about them. And then there are others where we have several specimens, and yet don’t know as much.

Speaking of Carnotaurus, I was wondering if anyone here could help me. I am trying to put together a 6-8 minute film about a carnotaurus but there is a key thing I am missing.
I would like to include a chase sequence but I am not entirely sure what dinosaur a carnotaurus would eat. Like what would be a good dinosaur to add into the film, for a carnotaurus to hunt, and would be considered somewhat accurate?
Antarctopelta and Saltasaurus would be good candidates.
I wouldn't say either, however. Carnotaurus was not built to hunt heavy-set armored prey as it had weak jaws and a light build.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

User avatar
Leviarex
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1027
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:49 pm
Location: Pellucidar
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Leviarex »

XxComablack1937xX wrote:Article - T-Rex was smarter then previously thought

link - https://www.thedailybeast.com/t-rex-was ... ref=scroll
:shock: You know, I pretty much speak for everyone here when I say that I never once would've considered it's I.Q. to be on the same level as a Chimp's. And suffice it to say that I won't be looking at the tyrant king the same way after this.

User avatar
TyrantGojira
EDF Instructor
Posts: 2104
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:20 pm
Location: Omicron Persei 8

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by TyrantGojira »

XxComablack1937xX wrote:Article - T-Rex was smarter then previously thought

link - https://www.thedailybeast.com/t-rex-was ... ref=scroll
The fact that a predatory animal that large and powerful is also that intelligent is chilling. Guess Jurassic Park wasn’t too far off with how intelligent dinosaurs were.
"Am I glad he's frozen in there and that we're out here, and that he's the sheriff, and that we're frozen out here, and that we're in there and I just remembered we're out here. What I wanna know is where's the caveman?"
Image

User avatar
BARAGONZILLA
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1164
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:57 pm
Location: Some where, in a vast land.

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by BARAGONZILLA »

I read it and thought it was interesting, up until they started talking about brain to body size ratio.

Now I am not well versed when it comes to the brain, but I do know that the size of your brain has nothing to do with intelligence, it’s about how your brain is organized. It’s about how big certain parts of your brain are. Certainly a big brain can help, but it generally has nothing to do with intelligence.
And when you actually look at the brain of a dinosaur, there isn’t a lot that suggests they were that intelligent. Not to say dinosaurs were stupid, but they definitely weren’t the intelligent that is shown in the Jurassic Park movies.
Of course this could be wrong, but that is how it looks at the moment, to me at the very least.

There’s also some other claims they make in this article, that at least to my knowledge, aren’t necessarily backed up by a lot of evidence. I don’t know. A lot of claims being tossed around here.
Last edited by BARAGONZILLA on Sat May 05, 2018 7:05 pm, edited 3 times in total.
This is the beginning of the end.

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 11919
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

I suppose a decent level of intelligence does make sense for Tyrannosaurs, though. Most of their available prey would've been difficult to hunt, being either fast or well-armed/armored. A quick, agile mind would've been a valuable asset for them. Chimp intelligence does sound like an exaggeration, though.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
Demon Lord Gira
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7258
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: Asleep

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Demon Lord Gira »

Yeah, I don't buy the idea that T-rex was anywhere near that smart. Was it a smart creature? By the standards of its time, no doubt, but there's more to intelligence than just brain size in relation to body mass. Many modern reptiles have brains that only fill half of their cranial cavity for starters, and intelligence has to do more with folds in the brain and surface area than straight out size. Nevermind who knows how much of that brain mass was devoted to the senses for T-rex? (Which, for a predator, is highly likely to be primarily focused on sight and smell)

The tree shrew has the largest brain in proportion to body size of any mammal, but I doubt you're going to be seeing anyone claiming "Hey, tree shrews are as smart as chimpanzees or dolphins!"
Come read my latest Fanfiction: Daily Life at the Cheshire Cafe

Image
GotengoXGodzilla wrote: It could be said that kaiju regeneration is like human dodging, basically.
GotengoXGodzilla wrote:That's not Mothra, that's an ugly goddamn demon!

User avatar
Andrew the Gojifan
Monsterland Worker
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:21 am
Location: Earth

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Andrew the Gojifan »

Gawdziller1954 wrote:
Andrew the Gojifan wrote:
Birdman wrote: This is news to me. Latenivenatrix is a pretty cool name though.
Not to mention Stenonychosaurus is back from synonimy!
And also the supergiant 26 meter Icthyosaur.
26 meters is peace-meal. People seem to forget the largest vertebrate EVER is considered to be an ichthyosaur of 50 meters and 200-400 tons.
Ah, yes, Hector`s Icthyosaur. We tend to be skeptical of that one. For the record it seems that 4 can be confused with 1 pretty often in old papers (it was described in 1884) so, it might not be that big, probably still pretty big for an Ichthyosaur.
Last edited by Andrew the Gojifan on Thu May 10, 2018 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Life is a Pay to Win rage game

User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

Andrew the Gojifan wrote:
Gawdziller1954 wrote:
Andrew the Gojifan wrote: Not to mention Stenonychosaurus is back from synonimy!
And also the supergiant 26 meter Icthyosaur.
26 meters is peace-meal. People seem to forget the largest vertebrate EVER is considered to be an ichthyosaur of 50 meters and 200-400 tons.
Ah, yes, Hector`s Icthyosaur. We tend to be skeptical of that one. For the record it seems that 4 can be confused with 1 pretty often in old papers (it was described in 1884) so, it might not be that big, probably still pretty big for an Ichthyosaur.
Well, no, the weight estimates and length estimates are from modern times based off of how fat the big ichthyosaurs are in comparison to a possibly 50 meter animal.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

User avatar
Andrew the Gojifan
Monsterland Worker
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:21 am
Location: Earth

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Andrew the Gojifan »

Gawdziller1954 wrote:
Andrew the Gojifan wrote:
Gawdziller1954 wrote: 26 meters is peace-meal. People seem to forget the largest vertebrate EVER is considered to be an ichthyosaur of 50 meters and 200-400 tons.
Ah, yes, Hector`s Icthyosaur. We tend to be skeptical of that one. For the record it seems that 4 can be confused with 1 pretty often in old papers (it was described in 1884) so, it might not be that big, probably still pretty big for an Ichthyosaur.
Well, no, the weight estimates and length estimates are from modern times based off of how fat the big ichthyosaurs are in comparison to a possibly 50 meter animal.
I`m not reffering to the weight or length but the vertebra size provided when it was first described
Life is a Pay to Win rage game

User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

Andrew the Gojifan wrote:
Gawdziller1954 wrote:
Andrew the Gojifan wrote: Ah, yes, Hector`s Icthyosaur. We tend to be skeptical of that one. For the record it seems that 4 can be confused with 1 pretty often in old papers (it was described in 1884) so, it might not be that big, probably still pretty big for an Ichthyosaur.
Well, no, the weight estimates and length estimates are from modern times based off of how fat the big ichthyosaurs are in comparison to a possibly 50 meter animal.
I`m not reffering to the weight or length but the vertebra size provided when it was first described
Doubtful, seeing as the vertebrae was found alongside a 36cm diameter vertebrae IIRC.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

User avatar
The Painkiller
Ronin
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:18 pm

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by The Painkiller »

Is anyone aware of any books from the last year or two containing information about most if not all known dinosaurs, flying reptiles, and/or other animals from their era (or I suppose just a massive encyclopedia)?

User avatar
Gawdziller1954
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: Painis Island

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Gawdziller1954 »

The Painkiller wrote:Is anyone aware of any books from the last year or two containing information about most if not all known dinosaurs, flying reptiles, and/or other animals from their era (or I suppose just a massive encyclopedia)?
Not really. The most recent i found (which I possess) still prints out the "25 meter Liopleurodon" myth.
OH NO, IT'S GAWDZILLER!! :D

Image

Post Reply