Should there be a destruction ranking system?

[menschenjaeger]

^ ooohhhh - how about a K rating?

[Living Corpse]

^ ooohhhh - how about a K rating?

I'm sensing a joke here but not quit grasping it.

[Shadow]

All units we have a H4- repeat H4-, some one is watching GINO for the first and is likely to break down afterword, please respond.
I like this level system, nice work OP.

[NSZ]

I've had an idea like this, only instead of the destruction caused, it was for the monsters themselves.

D1: The weakest of the weak, able to be harmed by hand held weapons. (Yog Trio)
D2: Monsters that are weak in the grand scheme of things, but are able to withstand more punishment than D1s. (Baragon)
D3: Monsters that can hold out against conventional weaponry, but can't cause tremendous amounts of damage before being driven off. (Varan, Anguirus)
D4: Monsters that can handle the majority of whatever's thrown at them. Can cause mass amounts of damage, but don't go out of their way to do so. (Godzilla, Rodan)
D5: Planet killers, the worst of the worst. Can really only be harmed and/or killed by other monsters. (King Ghidorah)